Skip to Content
Agencies | Governor (opens new window)
Search Virginia.Gov (opens new window)

Sussex County Public Schools

General school information

Division: Sussex County Public Schools
Address: 21302 Sussex Drive Stony Creek, VA 23882-3751
Superintendent: Dr. Arthur L. Jarrett Jr.
Region: 1
Division Website (opens new window)
Schools in this Division (opens new window)

Map results may not reflect school division or attendance zone boundaries.

Performance Snapshot

Accountability

Accountability

Assessments

Assessments

Enrollment

Enrollment

College & Career Readiness

College & Career Readiness

Finance

School Finance

Learning Climate

Learning Climate

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality


Assessments

Student Achievement by Proficiency Level

Reading

Reading Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia students are assessed annually in reading in grades 3-8 and once in high school with an end-of-course reading test. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view the results for a specific reading test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s English Standards of Learning prepare students to participate in society as literate citizens, equipped with the ability to communicate effectively in their communities, in the workplace, and in postsecondary education. As students progress, they become active and involved listeners and develop a full command of the English language, evidenced by their use of standard English and their growing spoken and written vocabularies.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 8 76 68 24 11 77 67 23 10 77 67 23
Female 9 83 73 17 10 82 72 18 10 78 68 22
Male 7 71 64 29 12 72 61 28 10 76 66 24
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black 7 75 69 25 9 75 66 25 8 76 67 24
Hispanic 7 79 71 21 8 77 69 23 13 63 50 37
White 12 80 68 20 15 84 69 16 14 87 74 13
Two or more races < < < < 18 91 73 9 10 70 60 30
Students with Disabilities 6 37 31 63 11 47 35 53 13 56 42 44
Economically Disadvantaged 9 73 65 27 7 78 71 22 6 75 68 25
English Learners < < < < < < < < < < < <
Grade 3 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 5 80 75 20 15 77 62 23 14 68 54 32
Female 10 90 80 10 9 80 70 20 18 65 48 35
Male 2 74 72 26 21 74 53 26 11 71 60 29
Black 3 81 78 19 12 71 59 29 13 66 54 34
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < < <
White 6 81 75 19 28 94 67 6 20 90 70 10
Students with Disabilities < < < < < < < < 20 60 40 40
Economically Disadvantaged 6 80 73 20 15 76 61 24 7 61 54 39
Grade 4 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 13 73 61 27 15 89 74 11 23 91 68 9
Female 14 81 68 19 12 97 85 3 15 90 74 10
Male 12 65 53 35 17 83 65 17 31 91 60 9
Black 13 75 63 25 13 88 75 13 22 89 67 11
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < 100 < 0
White 15 69 54 31 24 94 71 6 25 94 69 6
Students with Disabilities < < < < 20 73 53 27 45 73 27 27
Economically Disadvantaged 11 71 60 29 11 89 79 11 13 84 71 16
English Learners < < < < < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Grade 5 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 4 75 71 25 16 77 61 23 14 80 67 20
Female 7 80 73 20 14 81 67 19 17 89 71 11
Male 3 71 68 29 17 71 54 29 11 74 63 26
Black - 73 73 27 15 76 62 24 9 79 70 21
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < < < < < < < <
White 17 78 61 22 20 80 60 20 31 88 56 13
Students with Disabilities - 35 35 65 10 70 60 30 9 73 64 27
Economically Disadvantaged 2 73 71 27 6 73 67 27 10 80 71 20
Grade 6 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 18 77 59 23 11 72 61 28 9 74 65 26
Female 18 78 60 22 14 83 69 17 10 80 71 20
Male 18 76 58 24 8 61 53 39 8 68 59 32
Black 14 76 62 24 13 73 60 27 8 75 67 25
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < < <
White < < < < 5 68 63 32 17 78 61 22
Two or more races < < < < < < < < < 100 < 0
Students with Disabilities < < < < 11 32 21 68 - 64 64 36
Economically Disadvantaged 18 74 56 26 4 73 69 27 5 71 66 29
English Learners < < < < < < < <
Grade 7 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 8 69 61 31 7 80 73 20 5 75 70 25
Female 6 74 69 26 6 81 74 19 8 79 71 21
Male 10 65 55 35 8 79 72 21 3 71 68 29
Black 7 66 59 34 5 76 71 24 4 76 71 24
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < < < < < < < <
White 6 75 69 25 15 100 85 0 5 80 75 20
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
Students with Disabilities - 29 29 71 18 64 45 36 6 29 24 71
Economically Disadvantaged 9 69 60 31 - 83 83 17 3 74 71 26
Grade 8 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 5 72 68 28 13 68 55 32 5 73 68 27
Female 3 86 83 14 15 76 61 24 2 70 68 30
Male 6 63 57 37 11 58 47 42 7 75 68 25
Black 4 72 67 28 13 64 52 36 3 69 66 31
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
White 6 72 67 28 12 71 59 29 - 93 93 7
Students with Disabilities 5 21 16 79 13 33 20 67 14 57 43 43
Economically Disadvantaged 4 70 66 30 14 68 54 32 3 72 69 28
EOC English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 5 87 82 13 - 78 78 22 - 82 82 18
Female 5 90 85 10 - 79 79 21 - 76 76 24
Male 5 84 79 16 - 77 77 23 - 89 89 11
Black 3 83 80 17 - 77 77 23 - 80 80 20
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
White 11 94 83 6 - 82 82 18 - 93 93 7
Students with Disabilities < < < < - 20 20 80 - 45 45 55
Economically Disadvantaged 9 79 71 21 - 81 81 19 - 88 88 12
English Learners < 100 < 0 < < < <
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Writing

Writing Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students assessed in writing in grade 8 and once in high school with an end-of-course writing test. Prior to 2014, students also took a writing test in grade 5. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select a specific writing test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s English Standards of Learning prepare students to participate in society as literate citizens, equipped with the ability to communicate effectively in their communities, in the workplace, and in postsecondary education. As students progress, they become active and involved listeners and develop a full command of the English language, evidenced by their use of standard English and their growing spoken and written vocabularies.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Writing Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 12 61 49 39 13 77 65 23 18 78 60 22
Female 9 65 56 35 13 81 68 19 18 77 59 23
Male 14 59 45 41 12 73 60 27 18 79 61 21
Black 9 56 47 44 10 74 64 26 17 78 61 22
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
White 23 74 52 26 20 86 66 14 16 78 63 22
Students with Disabilities 22 33 11 67 29 46 18 54 4 36 32 64
Economically Disadvantaged 11 56 45 44 9 80 71 20 17 73 56 27
Grade 8 Writing Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 9 52 43 48 12 77 65 23 16 76 59 24
Female 5 59 54 41 12 80 68 20 14 79 65 21
Male 12 47 35 53 11 73 62 27 19 72 53 28
Black 9 48 39 52 9 73 64 27 13 75 63 25
White 10 62 52 38 17 83 67 17 27 80 53 20
Students with Disabilities 15 25 10 75 19 38 19 63 8 46 38 54
Economically Disadvantaged 9 47 39 53 9 81 72 19 22 75 53 25
EOC Writing Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 17 78 61 22 14 78 64 22 20 80 61 20
Female 18 76 59 24 14 82 68 18 23 75 53 25
Male 17 79 62 21 14 73 59 27 17 86 69 14
Black 9 71 62 29 11 75 64 25 22 81 59 19
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
White 50 100 50 0 24 88 65 12 6 76 71 24
Students with Disabilities < < < < 42 58 17 42 - 25 25 75
Economically Disadvantaged 16 75 59 25 10 78 69 22 14 72 58 28
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Math

Math Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students assessed in mathematics in grades 3-8 and at the end of the following secondary mathematics courses: Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select a specific mathematics test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

The content of the Standards of Learning for mathematics supports the following five goals for students: becoming mathematical problem solvers, communicating mathematically, reasoning mathematically, making mathematical connections, and using mathematical representations to model and interpret practical situations.

Throughout a student’s mathematics schooling from kindergarten through grade eight, specific content strands or topics are included. These content strands are Number and Number Sense; Computation and Estimation; Measurement; Geometry; Probability and Statistics; and Patterns, Functions, and Algebra. The Standards of Learning for each strand progress in complexity at each grade level and throughout the high school courses.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Math Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 12 81 69 19 11 79 68 21 10 76 66 24
Female 12 86 74 14 12 84 72 16 9 78 69 22
Male 12 76 65 24 9 74 64 26 11 73 62 27
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black 11 81 70 19 9 79 71 21 8 74 66 26
Hispanic 21 79 57 21 15 81 67 19 9 71 62 29
White 13 81 69 19 15 75 60 25 16 82 66 18
Two or more races < 100 < 0 20 100 80 0 10 80 70 20
Students with Disabilities 6 46 40 54 8 53 45 47 12 58 46 42
Economically Disadvantaged 13 79 66 21 9 79 69 21 6 72 66 28
English Learners < < < < < < < < < < < <
Grade 3 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 14 91 76 9 23 89 65 11 11 65 54 35
Female 13 90 77 10 21 93 72 7 15 63 48 38
Male 15 91 76 9 26 84 58 16 7 67 60 33
Black 12 88 76 12 23 87 64 13 10 63 54 37
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
White 19 100 81 0 24 94 71 6 10 80 70 20
Students with Disabilities < < < < < < < < 20 60 40 40
Economically Disadvantaged 16 89 73 11 27 90 63 10 4 59 55 41
Grade 4 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 23 77 53 23 20 96 76 4 27 94 68 6
Female 28 82 54 18 27 97 70 3 17 97 81 3
Male 18 71 53 29 15 96 80 4 37 91 54 9
Black 24 78 53 22 13 95 82 5 26 93 67 7
Hispanic < < < < < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
White 23 85 62 15 47 100 53 0 38 100 62 0
Students with Disabilities < < < < 20 93 73 7 40 90 50 10
Economically Disadvantaged 22 75 52 25 21 98 77 2 13 92 79 8
English Learners < < < < < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Grade 5 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 26 79 53 21 20 87 67 13 26 85 59 15
Female 27 87 60 13 20 95 76 5 26 94 69 6
Male 25 73 48 28 20 77 57 23 27 78 51 22
Black 21 81 60 19 20 89 69 11 16 82 66 18
White 39 72 33 28 27 93 67 7 73 100 27 0
Students with Disabilities 6 41 35 59 < < < < 20 60 40 40
Economically Disadvantaged 24 80 57 20 15 81 66 19 17 85 68 15
Grade 6 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 7 79 72 21 9 78 68 22 - 80 80 20
Female 3 85 82 15 11 86 76 14 - 87 87 13
Male 13 71 58 29 8 69 62 31 - 73 73 27
Black 9 77 68 23 6 78 72 22 - 85 85 15
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < < < < < < < <
White < < < < 16 74 58 26 - 77 77 23
Students with Disabilities < < < < - 42 42 58 - 55 55 45
Economically Disadvantaged 9 79 70 21 11 78 67 22 - 76 76 24
English Learners < 100 < 0 < < < <
Grade 7 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 11 55 45 45 4 52 48 48 27 69 42 31
Female 17 61 43 39 < < < < 8 83 75 17
Male 4 50 46 50 - 50 50 50 43 57 14 43
Black 8 54 46 46 - 31 31 69 28 72 44 28
White < < < < < 100 < 0 < < < <
Students with Disabilities 7 27 20 73 - 45 45 55 < < < <
Economically Disadvantaged 10 51 41 49 9 64 55 36 < < < <
Grade 8 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 9 76 67 24 2 73 71 27 5 64 59 36
Female 8 78 70 23 4 75 71 25 3 61 58 39
Male 10 74 64 26 - 72 72 28 6 66 60 34
Black 7 74 66 26 1 76 74 24 2 48 46 52
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
White 5 79 74 21 - 53 53 47 9 91 83 9
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Students with Disabilities 10 48 38 52 - 43 43 57 12 65 53 35
Economically Disadvantaged 10 76 66 24 - 73 73 27 3 56 53 44
Algebra I Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 7 92 85 8 6 83 77 17 1 66 65 34
Female 4 96 91 4 10 88 79 12 2 69 67 31
Male 9 89 79 11 4 79 75 21 - 63 63 38
Black 10 92 82 8 4 85 81 15 1 65 64 35
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < < < < < < < <
White - 92 92 8 5 76 71 24 - 80 80 20
Students with Disabilities - 81 81 19 - 53 53 47 - 45 45 55
Economically Disadvantaged 9 94 86 6 4 81 77 19 - 57 57 43
Geometry Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students - 74 74 26 1 52 51 48 3 61 57 39
Female - 85 85 15 3 61 58 39 7 64 57 36
Male - 62 62 38 - 47 47 53 - 58 58 42
Black - 79 79 21 1 54 53 46 - 60 60 40
Hispanic < < < < < 100 < 0 < < < <
White - 54 54 46 - 44 44 56 - 64 64 36
Students with Disabilities < < < < - 17 17 83 < < < <
Economically Disadvantaged - 76 76 24 2 50 48 50 4 65 61 35
English Learners < 100 < 0 < < < <
Algebra II Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 14 100 86 0 2 93 92 7 4 91 87 9
Female 17 100 83 0 3 91 88 9 6 91 85 9
Male 11 100 89 0 - 96 96 4 2 91 89 9
Black 13 100 87 0 2 92 91 8 5 96 91 4
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
White < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 - 73 73 27
Students with Disabilities < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 - 82 82 18
Economically Disadvantaged 20 100 80 0 2 91 89 9 6 88 82 12
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Science

Science Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students are assessed in science in grades 5 and 8 and at the end of the following secondary courses: Earth Science, Biology, and Chemistry. Before 2014, students also were assessed in science in grade 4. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select results for a specific science test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s Science Standards of Learning identify academic content for essential components of the science curriculum at different grade levels. Standards are identified for kindergarten through grade five, for middle school, and for a core set of high school courses — Earth Science, Biology, Chemistry, and Physics. Throughout a student’s science schooling from kindergarten through grade six, content strands, or topics are included. The Standards of Learning in each strand progress in complexity as they are studied at various grade levels in grades K-6, and are represented indirectly throughout the high school courses.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Science Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 7 78 71 22 6 77 71 23 8 76 68 24
Female 6 79 73 21 5 81 76 19 7 80 73 20
Male 8 78 70 22 8 74 66 26 9 73 63 27
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black 7 78 71 22 4 76 72 24 5 72 66 28
Hispanic < < < < 8 75 67 25 11 83 72 17
White 8 81 73 19 13 81 68 19 15 90 75 10
Students with Disabilities 2 36 34 64 - 42 42 58 8 49 41 51
Economically Disadvantaged 7 75 67 25 4 75 71 25 6 73 67 27
English Learners < < < < < < < < < 100 < 0
Grade 5 Science Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 26 76 50 24 25 81 56 19 26 80 54 20
Female 27 80 53 20 21 86 64 14 26 89 63 11
Male 25 73 48 28 29 74 46 26 26 74 48 26
Black 27 73 45 27 20 80 61 20 16 75 60 25
White 21 84 63 16 50 93 43 7 56 94 38 6
Students with Disabilities - 35 35 65 - 60 60 40 27 64 36 36
Economically Disadvantaged 22 75 53 25 16 76 59 24 20 76 56 24
Grade 8 Science Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 6 74 69 26 6 69 62 31 7 80 73 20
Female - 74 74 26 - 76 76 24 5 82 77 18
Male 10 75 65 25 14 61 47 39 10 78 68 22
Black 4 72 67 28 4 65 61 35 8 76 68 24
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
White 10 80 70 20 17 78 61 22 - 93 93 7
Students with Disabilities 5 48 43 52 - 50 50 50 8 46 38 54
Economically Disadvantaged 6 72 66 28 4 62 58 38 11 82 71 18
Biology Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 4 77 73 23 - 72 72 28 - 62 62 38
Female 7 71 64 29 - 75 75 25 - 74 74 26
Male - 83 83 17 - 69 69 31 - 52 52 48
Black 5 80 75 20 - 72 72 28 - 58 58 42
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
White - 72 72 28 - 69 69 31 - 80 80 20
Students with Disabilities - 33 33 67 - 38 38 63 - 31 31 69
Economically Disadvantaged 3 81 78 19 - 75 75 25 - 59 59 41
Chemistry Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 2 100 98 0 - 96 96 4 3 83 80 17
Female - 100 100 0 - 100 100 0 - 81 81 19
Male 6 100 94 0 - 93 93 7 5 84 79 16
Black - 100 100 0 - 98 98 2 - 83 83 17
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
White < 100 < 0 < < < < < < < <
Economically Disadvantaged 7 100 93 0 - 97 97 3 - 78 78 22
English Learners < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Earth Science Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students - 78 78 22 - 82 82 18 3 79 76 21
Female - 78 78 22 - 78 78 23 3 74 71 26
Male - 77 77 23 - 85 85 15 2 83 81 17
Black - 78 78 22 - 79 79 21 2 74 72 26
Hispanic < < < < < 100 < 0 < < < <
White - 86 86 14 - 88 88 13 - 94 94 6
Students with Disabilities < < < < - 40 40 60 - 58 58 42
Economically Disadvantaged - 66 66 34 - 75 75 25 2 79 77 21
English Learners < < < < < 100 < 0
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

History

History Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students are assessed in history and social science following instruction in Virginia Studies in elementary school, Civics and Economics in middle school, and at the conclusion of the following secondary courses: World History and Geography to 1500, World History and Geography 1500 to the Present, World Geography, and Virginia and U.S. History. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select a specific history or social science test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s History and Social Science Standards of Learning are designed to

  • develop the knowledge and skills of history, geography, civics, and economics that enable students to place the people, ideas, and events that have shaped our state and our nation in perspective;
  • instill in students a thoughtful pride in the history of America through an understanding that what “We the People of the United States” launched more than two centuries ago was not a perfect union, but a continual effort to build a “more perfect” union, one which has become the world’s most successful example of constitutional self-government;
  • enable students to understand the basic values, principles, and operation of American constitutional democracy;
  • prepare students for informed, responsible, and participatory citizenship;
  • develop students’ skills in debate, discussion, and writing; and
  • provide students with a framework for continuing education in history and the social sciences.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: History Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 16 86 69 14 22 85 63 15 20 81 61 19
Female 16 84 68 16 20 86 67 14 21 82 60 18
Male 16 87 71 13 24 84 60 16 19 81 62 19
Black 16 84 69 16 18 84 66 16 18 80 62 20
Hispanic < 100 < 0 20 90 70 10 17 83 67 17
White 20 89 68 11 31 87 56 13 28 84 55 16
Students with Disabilities 7 62 56 38 19 69 50 31 11 59 48 41
Economically Disadvantaged 21 85 64 15 19 82 63 18 17 78 60 22
English Learners < 100 < 0 < < < < < < < <
VA & US History Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 10 79 69 21 6 79 73 21 4 71 66 29
Female 3 78 75 22 11 80 70 20 3 66 63 34
Male 17 81 64 19 - 76 76 24 6 75 69 25
Black 2 76 75 24 6 74 68 26 4 73 69 27
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
White 35 82 47 18 7 100 93 0 6 67 61 33
Students with Disabilities < < < < < < < < - 27 27 73
Economically Disadvantaged 3 77 73 23 6 77 72 23 4 71 67 29
English Learners < 100 < 0 < < < <
World History I Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 4 85 81 15 4 75 71 25 11 70 59 30
Female 3 84 82 16 3 81 78 19 15 74 59 26
Male 5 86 81 14 5 70 66 30 6 66 60 34
Black 5 85 80 15 3 74 71 26 7 64 56 36
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
White - 84 84 16 8 77 69 23 21 86 64 14
Students with Disabilities - 57 57 43 - 54 54 46 < < < <
Economically Disadvantaged 5 86 81 14 5 68 63 32 12 70 58 30
English Learners < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
World History II Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 12 94 82 6 2 85 83 15 - 75 75 25
Female 13 94 81 6 4 85 81 15 - 72 72 28
Male 11 94 83 6 - 85 85 15 - 77 77 23
Black 8 92 84 8 - 89 89 11 - 75 75 25
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < < < < < < < <
White 27 100 73 0 < < < < < < < <
Students with Disabilities < 100 < 0 < < < <
Economically Disadvantaged < 100 < 0 - 79 79 21 - 69 69 31
Civics & Econ Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 14 89 75 11 20 89 69 11 22 91 68 9
Female 19 89 69 11 13 87 74 13 26 93 67 7
Male 10 90 79 10 29 91 63 9 19 88 69 12
Black 16 89 73 11 16 91 75 9 21 90 70 10
White 11 89 79 11 33 80 47 20 27 93 67 7
Students with Disabilities - 69 69 31 9 64 55 36 - 67 67 33
Economically Disadvantaged 14 88 74 12 19 90 71 10 24 89 66 11
VA Studies Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 39 82 43 18 68 100 32 0 54 94 40 6
Female 41 77 36 23 65 100 35 0 51 94 43 6
Male 36 88 52 12 71 100 29 0 56 94 38 6
Black 40 79 40 21 65 100 35 0 48 94 46 6
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
White 38 92 54 8 76 100 24 0 85 92 8 8
Students with Disabilities < < < < 43 100 57 0 < < < <
Economically Disadvantaged 40 81 40 19 66 100 34 0 45 89 45 11
English Learners < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Percent of Kindergarten Students Meeting Literacy Benchmarks

All Kindergartners

Elementary schools use Virginia Department of Education-approved diagnostic assessments to measure children’s knowledge of the following literacy fundamentals: phonological awareness, alphabet recognition, concept of word, knowledge of letter sounds and spelling. These assessments provide a direct means of matching literacy instruction to specific literacy needs and provide a means of identifying children who are behind in their acquisition of these skills and therefore eligible for services through the commonwealth’s Early Intervention Reading Initiative.

 

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Percent of Kindergarten Students Meeting Literacy Benchmarks Division: 82.09 State: 89.72 Division: 76.83 State: 88.34 Division: 69.23 State: 88.19

Number of recently arrived English language learners exempted from state reading assessments

2015-20162016-20172017-2018
State3,4624,2272,762
Division000
Number of recently arrived English language learners exempted from state reading assessments

Enrollment

Fall Membership by Grade

Grade 2015-20162016-20172017-2018
Pre-kindergarten303744
Kindergarten698881
Grade 1787276
Grade 2858976
Grade 3768191
Grade 4768177
Grade 5707784
Grade 6827377
Grade 7768873
Grade 8887884
Grade 9808686
Grade 10948386
Grade 11768867
Grade 12868578
Total Students1,0661,1061,080
Fall Membership by Grade
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

Fall Membership by Subgroups

2017 Fall Membership By Subgroup: Racial and Ethnic Groups

The Virginia Department of Education annually collects statistics on the number of students enrolled in public schools on September 30.  Student counts are reported by grade assignment, race, ethnicity, disability, English proficiency, and economic status.

The collection of race and ethnicity information as specified by the U.S. Department of Education is required for eligibility for federal education funds and for accountability reports.

A student is reported as economically disadvantaged if he or she meets any one of the following criteria:

  • Is eligible for Free/Reduced Meals;
  • Receives Temporary Assistance for Needy Families;
  • Is eligible for Medicaid; or
  • Is a migrant or is experiencing homelessness.

.

Fall Membership by Subgroup
Subgroup 2015-20162016-20172017-2018
All Students106611061080
Female514527518
Male552579562
Asian421
Black809830800
Hispanic273541
White216223225
Two or more races101613
Students with Disabilities158171175
Not Students with Disabilities908935905
Economically Disadvantaged762689481
Not Economically Disadvantaged304417599
English Learners111212
Not English Learners105510941068
Homeless41310
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

College & Career Readiness

Diplomas and Completion

Class of 2018: All Students

Division

State

Most Virginia students earn either an Advanced Studies Diploma or a Standard Diploma.

To graduate with an Advanced Studies Diploma, a student must earn at least 26 standard units of credit by passing required courses and electives and at least nine verified units of credit by passing Standards of Learning end-of-course assessments in English, mathematics, science and history. Students who entered the ninth grade in 2013-2014 and afterwards must also successfully complete one virtual course.

To graduate with a Standard Diploma, a student must earn at least 22 standard units of credit by passing required courses and electives, and earn at least six verified credits by passing end-of-course SOL tests or other assessments approved by the Board of Education. Students who entered the ninth grade in 2013-2014 and afterwards must earn a board-approved career and technical education credential to graduate and successfully complete one virtual course.

The Applied Studies Diploma and Modified Standard Diploma are available for certain students with disabilities. To reduce the likelihood of division-level pie charts being suppressed to protect student privacy, these diplomas are combined with Standard Diplomas in the pie chart as “Standard and Other Diplomas.” 

Status of the Students in the 2017-2018 Cohort
Student Subgroup Type Advanced Diplomas Standard Diplomas Other Diplomas GED's Dropouts Other Non-Graduates
All Students Division 40 36 6 0 4 6
State 50979 36013 2733 1046 5404 1786
Female Division 25 17 0 0 2 2
State 27837 15823 920 366 1922 656
Male Division 15 19 6 0 2 4
State 23142 20190 1813 680 3482 1130
Black Division 31 26 4 0 2 4
State 7955 11090 1111 244 1359 744
Hispanic Division < < < < 0 <
State 5086 5583 317 105 2172 323
White Division 8 10 2 0 2 2
State 30218 16420 1139 617 1589 596
Students with Disabilities Division 1 3 6 0 1 1
State 1056 6505 2733 136 1108 108
Economically Disadvantaged Division 13 18 4 0 2 2
State 10704 17342 1680 460 2640 1096
Foster Care Division < < < < 0 <
State 35 175 31 10 56 15
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

Four-Year Virginia On-Time Graduation Rate

On-Time Graduation Rate Over Time

All Students

The Virginia On-Time Graduation Rate is based on four years of longitudinal student-level data and accounts for student mobility, changes in student enrollment, and local decisions on the promotion and retention of students. The formula also recognizes that some students with disabilities and English learners are allowed more than the standard four years to earn a diploma and are still counted as “on-time” graduates.

Graduates are defined as students who earn an Advanced Studies Diploma, Standard Diploma, Modified Standard Diploma, or Applied Studies Diploma. On-time graduates are students who earn one of these diplomas within four years of entering the ninth grade. Special education students and English learners who have plans in place that allow them more time to graduate are counted as on-time graduates or as non-graduates when they earn a diploma or otherwise exit high school.

Status of Students After Four Years of High School
Students Subgroup Students in Cohort Graduates On-Time Graduation Rate Completers Completion Rate Cohort Dropouts Cohort Dropout Rate
All Students928289.18289.144.3
Female464291.34291.324.3
Male464087408724.3
Black676191619123
Hispanic0<100<10000
White242083.32083.328.3
Students with Disabilities121083.31083.318.3
Economically Disadvantaged393589.73589.725.1
Foster Care0<100<10000
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Gap Group 1 = Students with Disabilities, English Language Learners, Economically Disadvantaged Students (unduplicated)
Gap Group 2 = Black Students
Gap Group 3 = Hispanic Students
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Advanced Program Information: Number and Percentage of Students Enrolled in Advanced Programs

Advanced Program Information
Count/Percentage
Program Type 2015-20162016-20172017-2018
Advanced Placement Test Taken - 11 / 3.22%6 / 1.9%
Advanced Placement Course Enrollment - 15 / 4.39%7 / 2.22%
Dual Enrollment18 / 5.36%26 / 7.6%28 / 8.86%
Governor’s School Enrollment8 / 2.38%8 / 2.34%8 / 2.53%
IB Course Enrollment - - -
Senior Enrolled in IB Program - - -
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

Postsecondary Enrollment

2015-2016 Postsecondary Enrollment: All Students

Postsecondary enrollment reports show the number and percent of Virginia high school graduates who enrolled in an institution of higher education within sixteen months of graduating from high school. In keeping with federal reporting requirements, postsecondary enrollment reports only include students who earned an Advanced Studies Diploma, International Baccalaureate Diploma or Standard Diploma; students who earned other Virginia Board of Education-approved diplomas are not counted as graduates in the calculation. Reports are available at the state, division and school levels for all students and for student subgroups.

The data represent the best available estimates at this time of postsecondary enrollment. There is currently no definitive source of all postsecondary enrollment records by state, division or school. Virginia Department of Education and external researchers have determined that the best available estimates contained in the postsecondary enrollment reports are likely underestimates, but capture at least 88 percent of Virginia public high school graduates’ postsecondary enrollments.

2015-2016 FGI cohort year (students entering high school in 2012)
Total number of students in the cohort earning a federally recognized high school diploma Students who enrolled in any Institution of Higher Education (IHE) within 16 months of earning a federally recognized high school diploma
Type Total Total HE Remaining Percent
All Students Division 67 39 42
State 82482 57560 30
Female Division 33 22 33
State 41546 31230 25
Male Division 34 17 50
State 40936 26330 36
Asian Division 0 < 100
State 5492 4724 14
Black Division 54 34 37
State 18272 11640 36
Hispanic Division 0 < 100
State 8547 5341 38
White Division 0 < 100
State 46319 33154 28
Students with Disabilities Division 0 < 100
State 5986 3008 50
Economically Disadvantaged Division 50 29 42
State 23515 13119 44
English Learners Division 0 < 100
State 5120 3136 39
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results. - = no data available for that group This report provides the best available estimates about college enrollment according to the National Student Clearinghouse. For more information, see the answers to Frequently Asked Questions about this report at: http://www.doe.virginia.gov/school_finance/arra/stabilization/reported_data/assurance_c/faq_c11.pdf. Students who attended schools that do not participate in NSC are not included in the number or percent of students enrolled in an IHE. Federally recognized high school diplomas include Standard, Advanced Studies, or International Baccalaureate (IB) diplomas. Most subgroups are based on students' most recent status.

Career & Technical Education

Students Earning One or More CTE Credentials: All Students

Virginia’s 16 career clusters help students investigate careers and design a rigorous and relevant plan of study to advance their career goals. Each career cluster contains multiple pathways that represent a common set of academic, technical and work-place skills. Career pathways lead to credentials that qualify students for a range of career opportunities from entry to professional level. A credential is defined as:

  • State-Issued Professional License, required for entry into a specific occupation as determined by a Virginia state licensing agency;
  • Full Industry Certification, from a recognized industry, trade, or professional association validating essential skills of a particular occupation;
  • Pathway Industry Certification, which may consist of entry-level exams as a component of a suite of exams in an industry certification program leading toward full certification; or
  • Occupational competency assessment, a national standardized assessment of skills/knowledge in a specific career and/or technical area, (NOCTI).

Virginia defines a CTE completer as a student who has met the requirements for a career and technical concentration and all requirements for high school graduation or an approved alternative education program.

Career and Technical Education
Count
2015-20162016-20172017-2018
NOCTI AssessmentsDivision334
 State413936233471
State LicensuresDivision-44
 State179019641412
Industry CertificationDivision326440
 State100544109590103892
Workplace ReadinessDivision112034
 State307754231350242
Total Credentials EarnedDivision469182
 State137248157490159017
Students Earning One or More CredentialsDivision438275
 State109089126113127744
CTE CompletersDivision565571
 State424044051640514
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

Advanced Placement Participation and Achievement

AP Achievement
2013-2014
Number of Test Takers Number of Tests Taken Number of Tests with Qualifying Scores Percentage of Tests Passed
All Students 11 13 0 0%
2014-2015
Number of Test Takers Number of Tests Taken Number of Tests with Qualifying Scores Percentage of Tests Passed
All Students < < < <%
2015-2016
Number of Test Takers Number of Tests Taken Number of Tests with Qualifying Scores Percentage of Tests Passed
All Students 12 13 0 0%
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

School Finance

Percentage of Expenditures

Division Expenditures

Multiple factors should be considered when comparing the level of school division expenditures for instruction and expenditures for non-instructional costs, such as administration, health services and pupil transportation. These factors include economies of scale, geographic size, and the number of students requiring special services. For example:

  • Smaller school divisions may have similar administrative and support costs as larger divisions but these non-instructional costs are spread over a smaller expenditure base.
  • Geographically large but sparsely populated school divisions may have higher per-pupil transportation costs because of travel distances and mountainous topography.
  • Divisions with large populations of at-risk or special needs students must provide support services that are required or that raise student achievement.
School Division - Percentage of Expenditures
  2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Percentage of fiscal year division
operating expenditures for instructional costs
56.3 58.6 54.6

Statewide Expenditures

The state Board of Education prescribes the following major classifications for expenditures of school funds: instruction; administration, attendance and health; pupil transportation; operation and maintenance; school food services and other non-instructional operations; facilities, debt and fund transfers; technology; and contingency reserves.

Instructional costs include the salaries and benefits paid to teachers, teacher aides, principals, assistant principals, librarians, and guidance counselors; expenditures for textbooks; and expenditures for students to participate in regional and virtual instructional programs.

School State - Percentage of Expenditures
  2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Percentage of fiscal year state
operating expenditures for instructional costs
67.1 66.9 67.2

Sources of Financial Support and Total Per Pupil Expenditures for Operations

Division Per-Pupil Spending

School divisions report annually on expenditures and appropriations to meet each locality’s required local effort in support of the Standards of Quality and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. The amount by which school divisions exceed these required minimums varies based on local decisions and circumstances.

Most state support for public education is equalized to reflect each division’s capacity to support the required educational program. The Composite Index of Local Ability-to-Pay determines state and local shares of Standards of Quality costs for each division and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. A portion of state sales tax revenues is distributed in support of public education based on school-age population estimates.

The federal government provides assistance to state and local education agencies in support of specific federal initiatives and mandates, such as instructional services for economically disadvantaged students and students with disabilities.

School Division - Per-Pupil Spending
  Local Funding State Federal
2014-20157,793.007,166.001,467.00
2015-20167,821.007,066.001,608.00
2016-20177,361.007,537.001,746.00

Statewide Per-Pupil Spending

The apportionment of the state funds for public education is the responsibility of the General Assembly, through the Appropriations Act. General fund appropriations serve as the mainstay of state support for the commonwealth’s public schools, augmented by retail sales and use tax revenues, state lottery proceeds, and other sources.

Counties, cities and towns comprising school divisions also support public education by providing the locality’s share to maintain an educational program meeting the commonwealth’s Standards of Quality and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. .

While public education is primarily a state and local responsibility, the federal government provides assistance to state and local education agencies in support of specific federal initiatives and mandates.

 

State - Per-Pupil Spending
  Local Funding State Federal
2014-20155,950.004,802.00771.00
2015-20166,101.004,831.00812.00
2016-20176,268.005,033.00871.00

Learning Climate

Percent of Students Absent

Percent of Students Absent 2017-2018 School Year:

NOTE TO USERS: THIS DATA AND PRESENTATION ABOVE DO NOT REFLECT THE FORMULA USED TO CALCULATE CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM INDICATORS FOR STATE ACCREDITATION AND ESSA. THIS PRESENTATION WILL BE REVISED WITH THE ADDITION OF ESSA INDICATORS ON DECEMBER 31, 2018.

Daily attendance is critical to success in school. A student is considered chronically absent if he or she misses two or more instructional days per month (18 days, or 10 percent of a 180-day school year) regardless of whether the absences are excused or unexcused. According to the U.S. Department of Education:

  • Children who are chronically absent in preschool, kindergarten, and first grade are much less likely to read on grade level by the third grade.
  • Students who can’t read at grade level by the third grade are four times more likely to drop out of high school.
  • By high school, regular attendance is a better dropout indicator than test scores.
  • A student who is chronically absent in any year between the eighth and twelfth grade is seven times more likely to drop out of school.
Absenteeism by Subgroup
2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Subgroup 0%-10%10%-15%15%-20%20+% 0%-10%10%-15%15%-20%20+% 0%-10%10%-15%15%-20%20+% 0%-10%10%-15%15%-20%20+%
All Students9421106365896117447089912552878631106677
Female444502425431522031432602437419502639
Male498603940465652439467652850444604038
American Indian0000
Asian0000000000000000
Black715844439680873144665934062633835151
Hispanic31311322033263036314
White17821172417226122218823824179231421
Two or more races1121082111231114101
Students with Disabilities13721102114918111414222622135111121
Economically Disadvantaged763935356639903752409823458419693442
English Learners1400013000103008011
Homeless32241121571430000
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Standards of Accreditation (SOA) Offenses Data

2016-2017 Offenses
  Number of Offenses
Offenses Against Student <
Offenses Against Staff <
Weapons Offenses <
Property Offenses <
All Other Offenses 15
Other Offenses Against Persons 66
Disorderly or Disruptive Behavior Offenses 265
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Offenses <
Technology Offenses <
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Short Term Suspensions

Short Term Suspensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

A short-term suspension (10 days of less) may be imposed by a principal, an assistant principal, or a designee teacher in the principal’s absence. The principal or assistant principal must tell the student of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his version of what occurred. Notice to the parent may be oral or written, depending on local school board policy, and must include information on the length of the suspension, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired.  A parent may ask for a short-term suspension decision to be reviewed by the superintendent or his designee. Local school board policy will determine whether the superintendent’s decision is final or can be appealed to the local school board. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Short Term Suspensions
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
Subgroup % Population% Short Term Suspensions% Population% Short Term Suspensions% Population% Short Term Suspensions
American Indian0.180.76
Asian0.450.3750.181
Black75.40579.0175.89179.1775.04584.78
Hispanic2.8833.442.5332.53.1651.04
Native Hawaiian
White2016.7920.26317.9220.16313.84
Two or more races1.0810.9380.421.4470.35
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Long Term Suspensions

Long Term Supensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

A long-term suspension (more than 10 school days and less than 365 calendar days)  is usually imposed by a disciplinary hearing officer upon recommendation of a principal. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred. Notice to the parent (and child) must be in writing and must include information on the length of and reason for the suspension, the right to a hearing in accordance with local school board policy, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired or to attend an appropriate alternative education program approved by the school board during the suspension or after the suspension period expires. Costs for any community-based educational programs or alternative programs that are not part of the program offered by the school division are the financial responsibility of the parent. A parent has the right to appeal a long-term suspension decision in accordance with local school board policy. The appeal may first go to the local superintendent or his or her designee or to a sub-committee of the local school board; final appeal is to the full school board. The appeal must be decided by the school board within 30 days. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Long Term Suspensions
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
Subgroup % Population% Long Term Suspensions% Population% Long Term Suspensions% Population% Long Term Suspensions
American Indian0.18
Asian0.450.3750.181
Black75.40510075.89175.045
Hispanic2.8832.5333.165
Native Hawaiian
White2020.26320.163
Two or more races1.0810.9381.447
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Expulsions

Expulsions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

An expulsion (removal from school for 365 calendar days) may only be imposed by a local school board. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred.  The parent (and child) must be noticed in writing of the proposed expulsion, the reasons the expulsion is being proposed, and of the right to a hearing before the school board or a sub-committee of the school board, depending on local policy. If the student is expelled, the parent is sent a written notification of the length of the expulsion and information on the availability of community-based educational, training, and intervention programs. The notice must state whether the student is eligible to return to regular school or to attend an approved alternative education program or an adult education program offered during or after the period of expulsion. The student may apply for readmission to be effective one calendar year from the date of his or her expulsion. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Expulsions
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
Subgroup % Population% Expulsions% Population% Expulsions% Population% Expulsions
American Indian0.18
Asian0.450.3750.181
Black75.40575.89175.045
Hispanic2.8832.5333.165
Native Hawaiian
White2020.26320.163
Two or more races1.0810.9381.447
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility:

School divisions that choose to take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated commodities from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal they serve. In return, they must serve lunches that meet Federal requirements, and they must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children. The School Breakfast Program operates by supporting breakfasts in the same manner as the National School Lunch Program.

 

At the beginning of each school year, letters and meal applications are distributed to households of children attending school. This letter informs households that school nutrition programs are available and that free and reduced-price meals are available based on income criteria. Applications have been eliminated totally in divisions that implement the community eligibility provision for all schools within the division.

Children from families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the poverty level are eligible for free meals. Those between 130 percent and 185 percent of the poverty level are eligible for reduced-price meals, for which students can be charged no more than 40 cents for lunch and 30 cents for breakfast. All other students pay the full price for meals.

See the Virginia Department of Education website for more information about school nutrition programs.

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 86.8478.9978.95
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students :

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Breakfast Program. The School Breakfast Program is a federally assisted meal program that provides nutritious breakfast meals to students. The Virginia Department of Education administers the program at the state level and school divisions administer the program at the local level.

Participation in the School Breakfast Program has been linked increased achievement, reduced absenteeism and tardiness, fewer disciplinary problems, and better student health.

Breakfast menus must provide one-fourth of the daily recommended levels for protein, calcium, iron, Vitamin A, Vitamin C and calories. Participating schools must serve breakfasts that meet Federal nutrition standards – one quarter of daily recommended levels of protein, calcium, iron, vitamins A and C and calories – and must provide free and reduced-price breakfasts to eligible children.

The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.

 

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 64.8963.5462.81
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students:

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Lunch Program.

School divisions that take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated food items from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal served. In return, schools must serve lunches that meet federal requirements, and must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children.

Studies show that well-nourished students are better learners. The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.

 

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 82.9785.6384.32
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Teacher Quality

Student-Teacher Ratio

2016-2017 Grades K-7 Student Teacher Ratio: 10.44 : 1

student ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio icon

2016-2017 Grades 8-12 Student Teacher Ratio: 11.63 : 1

student ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio iconstudent ratio icon

Provisionally Licensed Teachers

Provisionally Licensed Teachers
  2016-20172017-2018
Provisional6%10%
Provisional Special Education0%0%
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

This table reports the percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials.

This table provides data on the percentage of classes not taught by teachers meeting the federal definition of highly qualified.

Federal education law defines a highly qualified teacher as a teacher who is fully licensed by the state, has at least a bachelor’s degree, has demonstrated competency in each subject taught, and is teaching in his or her area of endorsement.

Virginia’s licensure regulations – which emphasize content knowledge as well as pedagogy – require new teachers to far exceed the federal highly qualified standard.

Teacher Educational Attainment

Teacher Educational Attainment: 2017-2018

The Virginia Department of Education reports annually on the percentage of teachers with bachelor’s, master’s, or doctorate degrees in schools, school divisions, and the state by highest degree earned.

Teacher Educational Attainment
  Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Doctoral Degree Other
2015-201634%60%3%3%
2016-201738%57%3%2%
2017-201843%55%1%1%
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Sussex County Public Schools to top