Skip to Content
Agencies | Governor (opens new window)
Search Virginia.Gov (opens new window)

Page Middle

General school information

Category: Middle (06-08) School
Phone: 804-693-2540
Address: 5198 TC Walker Rd Gloucester, VA 23061
Principal: Dr. Patricia McMahon
Superintendent: Dr. Walter Clemons
Region: 3
Division: Gloucester County Public Schools
Division Website (opens new window)

Map results may not reflect school division or attendance zone boundaries.

Performance Snapshot

Accountability

Assessments

Assessments

Enrollment

Enrollment

Finance

School Finance

Learning Climate

Learning Climate

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality

State Accreditation Status

Accredited

Reward School Status


ACCREDITATION

Accreditation Status This Year: Accredited

School Quality Indicators

Academic Achievement

English Level One
Mathematics Level One
Science Level One

Achievement Gaps

EnglishLevel Two
MathematicsLevel Two

Student engagement & Outcomes

Chronic Absenteeism Level One

Accredited: All indicators at Level One or Level Two or Waiver
Accredited With Conditions: One or more indicators at Level Three
Accreditation Denied: Under State Sanction

Achievement Gaps: English and Mathematics

Reporting on the achievement and progress of student groups allows schools to identify learners in need of additional support and resources.

Student Group Achievement Gap - English Achievement Gap - Math
Asian Level One Level One
Black Level Two Level One
Economically Disadvantaged Level One Level One
English Learners Level One Level Two
Hispanic Level One Level One
Students with Disabilities Level Two Level Three
White Level One Level One

18.28% of the students in this school were chronically absent.

Assessments

Student Achievement by Proficiency Level

Reading

Reading Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia students are assessed annually in reading in grades 3-8 and once in high school with an end-of-course reading test. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view the results for a specific reading test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s English Standards of Learning prepare students to participate in society as literate citizens, equipped with the ability to communicate effectively in their communities, in the workplace, and in postsecondary education. As students progress, they become active and involved listeners and develop a full command of the English language, evidenced by their use of standard English and their growing spoken and written vocabularies.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 16 79 63 21 14 78 64 22 11 78 67 22
Female 19 80 61 20 17 82 66 18 14 82 68 18
Male 12 78 65 22 11 74 63 26 9 75 66 25
American Indian < 100 < 0 < < < < < 100 < 0
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black 13 65 53 35 7 67 60 33 3 58 55 43
Hispanic 9 78 70 22 9 78 70 22 9 69 60 31
White 16 80 63 20 15 79 64 21 12 81 68 19
Two or more races 4 76 72 24 11 81 70 19 9 76 67 24
Students with Disabilities 21 40 19 60 16 38 22 62 10 40 30 60
Economically Disadvantaged 9 69 59 31 8 65 57 35 7 67 60 33
English Learners < < < < < < < < 8 54 46 46
Grade 6 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 17 79 62 21 16 76 61 24 13 79 67 21
Female 22 81 58 19 15 88 73 12 16 80 64 20
Male 13 78 65 22 16 67 51 33 9 79 69 21
Black 15 62 46 38 - 71 71 29 - 45 45 55
Hispanic < < < < 7 71 64 29 < < < <
White 18 81 63 19 18 78 60 22 14 83 69 17
Two or more races 8 75 67 25 < < < < 8 69 62 31
Students with Disabilities 22 50 28 50 14 38 24 62 5 42 37 58
Economically Disadvantaged 12 68 56 32 10 67 57 33 7 70 63 30
English Learners < < < < < < < < < < < <
Grade 7 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 17 80 63 20 14 83 69 17 12 77 64 23
Female 20 81 61 19 19 83 65 17 17 83 66 17
Male 13 78 65 22 10 82 72 18 8 72 63 28
American Indian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black 7 43 36 57 8 85 77 15 - 71 71 29
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < < < < 7 64 57 36
White 16 82 66 18 14 83 68 17 14 78 64 22
Two or more races < < < < 8 83 75 17 < < < <
Students with Disabilities - 16 16 84 21 50 29 50 8 36 28 64
Economically Disadvantaged 5 68 62 32 10 69 59 31 7 63 56 37
English Learners < 100 < 0 < < < < < < < <
Grade 8 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 13 78 65 22 11 74 62 26 9 79 70 21
Female 16 78 62 22 15 76 60 24 10 84 73 16
Male 11 77 67 23 8 72 64 28 8 76 67 24
Black 15 92 77 8 13 47 33 53 8 50 42 50
Hispanic 8 85 77 15 < 100 < 0 - 67 67 33
White 14 76 62 24 12 74 63 26 10 82 72 18
Two or more races < < < < < < < < 9 82 73 18
Students with Disabilities 33 44 11 56 10 20 10 80 15 42 27 58
Economically Disadvantaged 9 70 61 30 5 60 55 40 7 68 61 32
English Learners < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Writing

Writing Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students assessed in writing in grade 8 and once in high school with an end-of-course writing test. Prior to 2014, students also took a writing test in grade 5. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select a specific writing test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s English Standards of Learning prepare students to participate in society as literate citizens, equipped with the ability to communicate effectively in their communities, in the workplace, and in postsecondary education. As students progress, they become active and involved listeners and develop a full command of the English language, evidenced by their use of standard English and their growing spoken and written vocabularies.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Writing Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 21 69 48 31 17 68 50 32 13 73 60 27
Female 30 75 45 25 24 72 48 28 17 81 63 19
Male 12 63 51 37 13 64 52 36 9 67 58 33
Black 8 69 62 31 21 36 14 64 20 50 30 50
Hispanic 8 58 50 42 < < < < - 80 80 20
White 23 69 46 31 17 69 53 31 13 74 61 26
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < < < < 9 73 64 27
Students with Disabilities 23 38 15 62 10 15 5 85 17 42 25 58
Economically Disadvantaged 14 57 42 43 7 49 43 51 10 59 49 41
Grade 8 Writing Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 21 69 48 31 17 68 50 32 13 73 60 27
Female 30 75 45 25 24 72 48 28 17 81 63 19
Male 12 63 51 37 13 64 52 36 9 67 58 33
Black 8 69 62 31 21 36 14 64 20 50 30 50
Hispanic 8 58 50 42 < < < < - 80 80 20
White 23 69 46 31 17 69 53 31 13 74 61 26
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < < < < 9 73 64 27
Students with Disabilities 23 38 15 62 10 15 5 85 17 42 25 58
Economically Disadvantaged 14 57 42 43 7 49 43 51 10 59 49 41
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Math

Math Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students assessed in mathematics in grades 3-8 and at the end of the following secondary mathematics courses: Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select a specific mathematics test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

The content of the Standards of Learning for mathematics supports the following five goals for students: becoming mathematical problem solvers, communicating mathematically, reasoning mathematically, making mathematical connections, and using mathematical representations to model and interpret practical situations.

Throughout a student’s mathematics schooling from kindergarten through grade eight, specific content strands or topics are included. These content strands are Number and Number Sense; Computation and Estimation; Measurement; Geometry; Probability and Statistics; and Patterns, Functions, and Algebra. The Standards of Learning for each strand progress in complexity at each grade level and throughout the high school courses.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Math Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 13 81 67 19 10 74 65 26 11 78 67 22
Female 15 82 67 18 9 78 69 22 13 82 69 18
Male 12 80 68 20 10 71 61 29 8 74 66 26
American Indian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black 8 70 63 30 9 55 45 45 3 63 60 38
Hispanic 4 91 87 9 12 76 64 24 18 68 50 32
White 14 82 68 18 10 76 66 24 10 80 70 20
Two or more races 8 60 52 40 7 74 67 26 15 74 59 26
Students with Disabilities 19 48 29 52 13 43 30 57 10 33 23 67
Economically Disadvantaged 10 68 58 32 6 63 57 37 8 71 63 29
English Learners < < < < < < < < 15 54 38 46
Grade 6 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 16 84 68 16 17 79 62 21 16 85 69 15
Female 18 85 67 15 17 87 70 13 14 84 70 16
Male 15 83 68 17 18 74 56 26 18 85 68 15
Black 8 69 62 31 6 65 59 35 - 64 64 36
Hispanic < < < < 21 71 50 29 < < < <
White 17 86 69 14 19 81 62 19 15 87 72 13
Two or more races 17 67 50 33 < < < < 21 79 57 21
Students with Disabilities 22 53 31 47 10 52 43 48 5 37 32 63
Economically Disadvantaged 13 74 60 26 10 74 64 26 12 79 67 21
English Learners < < < < < < < < < 100 < 0
Grade 7 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 7 67 60 33 4 60 55 40 4 61 57 39
Female 9 66 58 34 2 59 56 41 4 73 69 28
Male 6 67 61 33 6 60 55 40 5 53 47 47
American Indian < 100 < 0 < < < <
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black - 33 33 67 - 36 36 64 - 53 53 47
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < < < < - 45 45 55
White 8 70 62 30 4 61 56 39 5 64 59 36
Two or more races < < < < 8 58 50 42 < < < <
Students with Disabilities - 22 22 78 18 36 18 64 8 28 20 72
Economically Disadvantaged 3 54 51 46 5 45 40 55 - 53 53 47
English Learners < 100 < 0 < < < < < < < <
Grade 8 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 5 78 73 22 3 75 72 25 6 79 73 21
Female 7 81 74 19 3 81 78 19 9 83 74 17
Male 4 76 72 24 3 70 68 30 4 76 72 24
Black 18 100 82 0 14 50 36 50 - 73 73 27
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
White 5 75 70 25 2 77 76 23 7 81 74 19
Two or more races < < < < < < < < < < < <
Students with Disabilities 28 56 28 44 11 42 32 58 16 32 16 68
Economically Disadvantaged 6 65 59 35 3 67 64 33 7 75 68 25
English Learners < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < < < <
Algebra I Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 14 98 85 2 11 97 86 3 12 98 86 2
Female 6 100 94 0 15 100 85 0 27 95 68 5
Male 21 96 75 4 6 94 88 6 3 100 97 0
Black < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
White 16 98 82 2 11 97 85 3 8 98 90 2
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Students with Disabilities < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Economically Disadvantaged 15 100 85 0 - 100 100 0 17 100 83 0
English Learners < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Geometry Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 47 100 53 0 30 96 67 4 55 100 45 0
Female 52 100 48 0 27 100 73 0 75 100 25 0
Male 40 100 60 0 31 94 63 6 30 100 70 0
Black < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Hispanic < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
White 51 100 49 0 27 95 68 5 50 100 50 0
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Economically Disadvantaged < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Science

Science Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students are assessed in science in grades 5 and 8 and at the end of the following secondary courses: Earth Science, Biology, and Chemistry. Before 2014, students also were assessed in science in grade 4. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select results for a specific science test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s Science Standards of Learning identify academic content for essential components of the science curriculum at different grade levels. Standards are identified for kindergarten through grade five, for middle school, and for a core set of high school courses — Earth Science, Biology, Chemistry, and Physics. Throughout a student’s science schooling from kindergarten through grade six, content strands, or topics are included. The Standards of Learning in each strand progress in complexity as they are studied at various grade levels in grades K-6, and are represented indirectly throughout the high school courses.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Science Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 12 83 70 17 13 81 67 19 7 79 71 21
Female 12 78 66 22 13 79 66 21 9 77 69 23
Male 13 87 74 13 13 82 69 18 6 80 73 20
Black 17 83 67 17 13 47 33 53 9 45 36 55
Hispanic 8 85 77 15 < < < < - 55 55 45
White 13 82 69 18 13 83 70 17 7 83 76 17
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < < < < 9 55 45 45
Students with Disabilities 26 52 26 48 14 38 24 62 15 42 27 58
Economically Disadvantaged 11 74 64 26 8 65 57 35 5 68 63 32
English Learners < 100 < 0 < < < < < < < <
Grade 8 Science Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 12 83 70 17 13 81 67 19 7 79 71 21
Female 12 78 66 22 13 79 66 21 9 77 69 23
Male 13 87 74 13 13 82 69 18 6 80 73 20
Black 17 83 67 17 13 47 33 53 9 45 36 55
Hispanic 8 85 77 15 < < < < - 55 55 45
White 13 82 69 18 13 83 70 17 7 83 76 17
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < < < < 9 55 45 45
Students with Disabilities 26 52 26 48 14 38 24 62 15 42 27 58
Economically Disadvantaged 11 74 64 26 8 65 57 35 5 68 63 32
English Learners < 100 < 0 < < < < < < < <
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

History

History Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students are assessed in history and social science following instruction in Virginia Studies in elementary school, Civics and Economics in middle school, and at the conclusion of the following secondary courses: World History and Geography to 1500, World History and Geography 1500 to the Present, World Geography, and Virginia and U.S. History. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select a specific history or social science test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s History and Social Science Standards of Learning are designed to

  • develop the knowledge and skills of history, geography, civics, and economics that enable students to place the people, ideas, and events that have shaped our state and our nation in perspective;
  • instill in students a thoughtful pride in the history of America through an understanding that what “We the People of the United States” launched more than two centuries ago was not a perfect union, but a continual effort to build a “more perfect” union, one which has become the world’s most successful example of constitutional self-government;
  • enable students to understand the basic values, principles, and operation of American constitutional democracy;
  • prepare students for informed, responsible, and participatory citizenship;
  • develop students’ skills in debate, discussion, and writing; and
  • provide students with a framework for continuing education in history and the social sciences.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: History Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 28 88 60 12 29 84 56 16 33 88 55 12
Female 35 86 51 14 26 89 63 11 34 89 55 11
Male 22 90 68 10 31 81 50 19 33 87 54 13
Black 7 100 93 0 13 53 40 47 10 70 60 30
Hispanic 46 100 54 0 < 100 < 0 10 90 80 10
White 28 86 58 14 28 86 58 14 37 88 51 12
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < < < < 18 100 82 0
Students with Disabilities 26 63 37 37 10 43 33 57 13 58 46 42
Economically Disadvantaged 21 81 60 19 16 72 56 28 22 81 59 19
Civics & Econ Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 27 88 61 12 29 85 56 15 34 88 54 12
Female 33 85 52 15 27 89 62 11 35 89 54 11
Male 20 90 69 10 30 81 51 19 33 87 54 13
Black - 100 100 0 8 46 38 54 10 70 60 30
Hispanic 46 100 54 0 < 100 < 0 10 90 80 10
White 26 85 59 15 28 87 59 13 37 88 51 12
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < < < < 20 100 80 0
Students with Disabilities 10 50 40 50 6 39 33 61 10 50 40 50
Economically Disadvantaged 20 80 60 20 15 72 57 28 23 80 57 20
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Number of recently arrived English language learners exempted from state reading assessments

2015-20162016-20172017-2018
State3,4624,2272,762
Division134
School010
Number of recently arrived English language learners exempted from state reading assessments

Enrollment

Fall Membership by Grade

Grade 2015-20162016-20172017-2018
Grade 6242186165
Grade 7195244197
Grade 8199206243
Total Students636636605
Fall Membership by Grade
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

Fall Membership by Subgroups

2017 Fall Membership By Subgroup: Racial and Ethnic Groups

The Virginia Department of Education annually collects statistics on the number of students enrolled in public schools on September 30.  Student counts are reported by grade assignment, race, ethnicity, disability, English proficiency, and economic status.

The collection of race and ethnicity information as specified by the U.S. Department of Education is required for eligibility for federal education funds and for accountability reports.

A student is reported as economically disadvantaged if he or she meets any one of the following criteria:

  • Is eligible for Free/Reduced Meals;
  • Receives Temporary Assistance for Needy Families;
  • Is eligible for Medicaid; or
  • Is a migrant or is experiencing homelessness.

.

Fall Membership by Subgroup
Subgroup 2015-20162016-20172017-2018
All Students636636605
Female305289284
Male331347321
American Indian122
Asian234
Black404140
Hispanic182734
White548535492
Two or more races272833
Students with Disabilities787269
Not Students with Disabilities558564536
Economically Disadvantaged267247260
Not Economically Disadvantaged369389345
English Learners31012
Not English Learners633626593
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

School Finance

Percentage of Expenditures

Division Expenditures

Multiple factors should be considered when comparing the level of school division expenditures for instruction and expenditures for non-instructional costs, such as administration, health services and pupil transportation. These factors include economies of scale, geographic size, and the number of students requiring special services. For example:

  • Smaller school divisions may have similar administrative and support costs as larger divisions but these non-instructional costs are spread over a smaller expenditure base.
  • Geographically large but sparsely populated school divisions may have higher per-pupil transportation costs because of travel distances and mountainous topography.
  • Divisions with large populations of at-risk or special needs students must provide support services that are required or that raise student achievement.
School Division - Percentage of Expenditures
  2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Percentage of fiscal year division
operating expenditures for instructional costs
63.3 63 63.3

Statewide Expenditures

The state Board of Education prescribes the following major classifications for expenditures of school funds: instruction; administration, attendance and health; pupil transportation; operation and maintenance; school food services and other non-instructional operations; facilities, debt and fund transfers; technology; and contingency reserves.

Instructional costs include the salaries and benefits paid to teachers, teacher aides, principals, assistant principals, librarians, and guidance counselors; expenditures for textbooks; and expenditures for students to participate in regional and virtual instructional programs.

School State - Percentage of Expenditures
  2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Percentage of fiscal year state
operating expenditures for instructional costs
67.1 66.9 67.2

Sources of Financial Support and Total Per Pupil Expenditures for Operations

Division Per-Pupil Spending

School divisions report annually on expenditures and appropriations to meet each locality’s required local effort in support of the Standards of Quality and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. The amount by which school divisions exceed these required minimums varies based on local decisions and circumstances.

Most state support for public education is equalized to reflect each division’s capacity to support the required educational program. The Composite Index of Local Ability-to-Pay determines state and local shares of Standards of Quality costs for each division and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. A portion of state sales tax revenues is distributed in support of public education based on school-age population estimates.

The federal government provides assistance to state and local education agencies in support of specific federal initiatives and mandates, such as instructional services for economically disadvantaged students and students with disabilities.

School Division - Per-Pupil Spending
  Local Funding State Federal
2014-20154,384.005,093.00597.00
2015-20164,325.005,088.00591.00
2016-20174,622.005,436.00627.00

Statewide Per-Pupil Spending

The apportionment of the state funds for public education is the responsibility of the General Assembly, through the Appropriations Act. General fund appropriations serve as the mainstay of state support for the commonwealth’s public schools, augmented by retail sales and use tax revenues, state lottery proceeds, and other sources.

Counties, cities and towns comprising school divisions also support public education by providing the locality’s share to maintain an educational program meeting the commonwealth’s Standards of Quality and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. .

While public education is primarily a state and local responsibility, the federal government provides assistance to state and local education agencies in support of specific federal initiatives and mandates.

 

State - Per-Pupil Spending
  Local Funding State Federal
2014-20155,950.004,802.00771.00
2015-20166,101.004,831.00812.00
2016-20176,268.005,033.00871.00

Learning Climate

Percent of Students Absent

Percent of Students Absent 2017-2018 School Year:

NOTE TO USERS: THIS DATA AND PRESENTATION ABOVE DO NOT REFLECT THE FORMULA USED TO CALCULATE CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM INDICATORS FOR STATE ACCREDITATION AND ESSA. THIS PRESENTATION WILL BE REVISED WITH THE ADDITION OF ESSA INDICATORS ON DECEMBER 31, 2018.

Daily attendance is critical to success in school. A student is considered chronically absent if he or she misses two or more instructional days per month (18 days, or 10 percent of a 180-day school year) regardless of whether the absences are excused or unexcused. According to the U.S. Department of Education:

  • Children who are chronically absent in preschool, kindergarten, and first grade are much less likely to read on grade level by the third grade.
  • Students who can’t read at grade level by the third grade are four times more likely to drop out of high school.
  • By high school, regular attendance is a better dropout indicator than test scores.
  • A student who is chronically absent in any year between the eighth and twelfth grade is seven times more likely to drop out of school.
Absenteeism by Subgroup
2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Subgroup 0%-10%10%-15%15%-20%20+% 0%-10%10%-15%15%-20%20+% 0%-10%10%-15%15%-20%20+%
All Students602431522576551619553471221
Female28721714259239925521108
Male31522883173271029826213
American Indian000000000000
Asian000000000000
Black450014321039202
Hispanic223012530031321
Native Hawaiian0000
White50540141847846141944641817
Two or more races250112541030121
Students with Disabilities727316462266805
Economically Disadvantaged224289152323191323031920
English Learners0000820012201
Homeless0000
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Standards of Accreditation (SOA) Offenses Data

2016-2017 Offenses
  Number of Offenses
Offenses Against Staff <
Weapons Offenses <
Property Offenses <
All Other Offenses 18
Other Offenses Against Persons 18
Disorderly or Disruptive Behavior Offenses 90
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Offenses <
Offenses Against Student 11
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Short Term Suspensions

Short Term Suspensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

A short-term suspension (10 days of less) may be imposed by a principal, an assistant principal, or a designee teacher in the principal’s absence. The principal or assistant principal must tell the student of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his version of what occurred. Notice to the parent may be oral or written, depending on local school board policy, and must include information on the length of the suspension, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired.  A parent may ask for a short-term suspension decision to be reviewed by the superintendent or his designee. Local school board policy will determine whether the superintendent’s decision is final or can be appealed to the local school board. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Short Term Suspensions
  2015-20162016-2017
Subgroup % Population% Short Term Suspensions% Population% Short Term Suspensions
American Indian0.1570.314
Asian0.3140.472
Black6.28910.386.4476.02
Hispanic2.831.894.2451.2
Native Hawaiian
White86.16482.0884.11989.16
Two or more races4.2455.664.4033.61
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Long Term Suspensions

Long Term Supensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

A long-term suspension (more than 10 school days and less than 365 calendar days)  is usually imposed by a disciplinary hearing officer upon recommendation of a principal. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred. Notice to the parent (and child) must be in writing and must include information on the length of and reason for the suspension, the right to a hearing in accordance with local school board policy, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired or to attend an appropriate alternative education program approved by the school board during the suspension or after the suspension period expires. Costs for any community-based educational programs or alternative programs that are not part of the program offered by the school division are the financial responsibility of the parent. A parent has the right to appeal a long-term suspension decision in accordance with local school board policy. The appeal may first go to the local superintendent or his or her designee or to a sub-committee of the local school board; final appeal is to the full school board. The appeal must be decided by the school board within 30 days. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Long Term Suspensions
  2015-20162016-2017
Subgroup % Population% Long Term Suspensions% Population% Long Term Suspensions
American Indian0.1570.314
Asian0.3140.472
Black6.2896.447
Hispanic2.834.24516.67
Native Hawaiian
White86.16485.7184.11983.33
Two or more races4.24514.294.403
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Expulsions

Expulsions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

An expulsion (removal from school for 365 calendar days) may only be imposed by a local school board. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred.  The parent (and child) must be noticed in writing of the proposed expulsion, the reasons the expulsion is being proposed, and of the right to a hearing before the school board or a sub-committee of the school board, depending on local policy. If the student is expelled, the parent is sent a written notification of the length of the expulsion and information on the availability of community-based educational, training, and intervention programs. The notice must state whether the student is eligible to return to regular school or to attend an approved alternative education program or an adult education program offered during or after the period of expulsion. The student may apply for readmission to be effective one calendar year from the date of his or her expulsion. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Expulsions
  2015-20162016-2017
Subgroup % Population% Expulsions% Population% Expulsions
American Indian0.1570.314
Asian0.3140.472
Black6.2896.447
Hispanic2.834.245
Native Hawaiian
White86.16484.119
Two or more races4.2454.403
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility:

School divisions that choose to take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated commodities from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal they serve. In return, they must serve lunches that meet Federal requirements, and they must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children. The School Breakfast Program operates by supporting breakfasts in the same manner as the National School Lunch Program.

 

At the beginning of each school year, letters and meal applications are distributed to households of children attending school. This letter informs households that school nutrition programs are available and that free and reduced-price meals are available based on income criteria. Applications have been eliminated totally in divisions that implement the community eligibility provision for all schools within the division.

Children from families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the poverty level are eligible for free meals. Those between 130 percent and 185 percent of the poverty level are eligible for reduced-price meals, for which students can be charged no more than 40 cents for lunch and 30 cents for breakfast. All other students pay the full price for meals.

See the Virginia Department of Education website for more information about school nutrition programs.

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility
  2015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentage
All Students 35.6536.46
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students :

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Breakfast Program. The School Breakfast Program is a federally assisted meal program that provides nutritious breakfast meals to students. The Virginia Department of Education administers the program at the state level and school divisions administer the program at the local level.

Participation in the School Breakfast Program has been linked increased achievement, reduced absenteeism and tardiness, fewer disciplinary problems, and better student health.

Breakfast menus must provide one-fourth of the daily recommended levels for protein, calcium, iron, Vitamin A, Vitamin C and calories. Participating schools must serve breakfasts that meet Federal nutrition standards – one quarter of daily recommended levels of protein, calcium, iron, vitamins A and C and calories – and must provide free and reduced-price breakfasts to eligible children.

The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.

 

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation
  2015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentage
All Students 23.4523.61-
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students:

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Lunch Program.

School divisions that take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated food items from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal served. In return, schools must serve lunches that meet federal requirements, and must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children.

Studies show that well-nourished students are better learners. The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.

 

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation
  2015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentage
All Students 82.7480.26-
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Teacher Quality

Provisionally Licensed Teachers

Provisionally Licensed Teachers
  2016-20172017-2018
Provisional Special Education0%2%
Provisional7%6%
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

This table reports the percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials.

This table provides data on the percentage of classes not taught by teachers meeting the federal definition of highly qualified.

Federal education law defines a highly qualified teacher as a teacher who is fully licensed by the state, has at least a bachelor’s degree, has demonstrated competency in each subject taught, and is teaching in his or her area of endorsement.

Virginia’s licensure regulations – which emphasize content knowledge as well as pedagogy – require new teachers to far exceed the federal highly qualified standard.

Teacher Educational Attainment

Teacher Educational Attainment: 2017-2018

The Virginia Department of Education reports annually on the percentage of teachers with bachelor’s, master’s, or doctorate degrees in schools, school divisions, and the state by highest degree earned.

Teacher Educational Attainment
  Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Doctoral Degree Other
2015-201642%52%4%2%
2016-201743%54%4%-1%
2017-201842%55%4%-1%
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Page Middle to top