Skip to Content
Agencies | Governor (opens new window)
Search Virginia.Gov (opens new window)
Menu

Beverley Manor Middle

General school information

Category: Middle (06-08) School
Phone: 540-886-5806
Address: 58 Cedar Green Rd Staunton, VA 24401
Principal: Ms. Yvonne L. Howdyshell
Superintendent: Dr. Eric W. Bond
School Number: 212
Region: 5
Division: Augusta County Public Schools
Division Number: 8
Division Website (opens new window)

Map results may not reflect school division or attendance zone boundaries.

Accountability

Assessments

Assessments

Enrollment

Enrollment

Finance

Finance

Learning Climate

Learning Climate

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality

ESSA

Every Student Succeeds Act

User note: Updated information for some School Quality Profile reports is not available because of the closure of schools in March 2020 and the cancellation of state assessments.

ACCREDITATION

2020 Accreditation Status: Accreditation Waived
Accreditation Status Last Year: Accredited

Annual accreditation is waived for all Virginia public schools for the 2020-2021 school year due to the cancellation of spring 2020 state assessments.

+ View 2019 School Quality Indicator Reports

Assessments

Student Achievement by Proficiency Level

Reading Performance: All Students

This chart displays the percentage of students passing state reading tests. Virginia students are assessed annually in reading in grades 3-8 and once in high school with an end-of-course (EOC) reading test. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view results for a specific test. Use the menu below the chart to select results for a specific group of students. Practice test items representative of the content and skills included in current Standards of Learning assessments are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.
English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 16 58 74 26 14 65 79 21 16 65 81 19
Female 19 63 82 18 17 67 84 16 19 68 88 12
Male 13 55 68 32 12 63 75 25 13 63 76 24
American Indian < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Asian < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
Black - 82 82 18 - 54 54 46 < < < <
Hispanic - 57 57 43 5 82 86 14 5 74 79 21
White 16 58 75 25 15 64 79 21 16 66 81 19
Multiple Races 14 57 71 29 15 77 92 8 27 47 73 27
Students with Disabilities 9 21 29 71 8 29 38 63 10 32 42 58
Students without Disabilities 17 62 79 21 15 69 84 16 16 70 86 14
Economically Disadvantaged 9 56 64 36 10 60 70 30 12 60 72 28
Not Economically Disadvantaged 21 60 81 19 18 68 86 14 18 69 88 12
English Learners < < < < < < < < < < < <
Homeless < < < < < < < < 10 60 70 30
Military Connected 14 79 93 7 < < 100 0
Foster Care < < 100 0 < < < <
Grade 6 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 25 56 81 19 17 62 79 21 17 65 82 18
Female 28 59 87 13 20 61 81 19 22 69 90 10
Male 22 53 76 24 15 62 77 23 14 63 77 23
American Indian < < 100 0
Black < < < < < < < < < < < <
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < < <
White 25 56 81 19 18 62 80 20 17 66 83 17
Multiple Races < < < < < < 100 0 < < < <
Students with Disabilities 15 26 41 59 - 27 27 73 14 36 50 50
Students without Disabilities 26 59 86 14 19 65 84 16 18 69 87 13
Economically Disadvantaged 16 59 75 25 13 56 69 31 13 59 71 29
Not Economically Disadvantaged 31 54 85 15 20 66 86 14 21 71 92 8
English Learners < < < < < < < <
Homeless < < < < < < 100 0
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Foster Care < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Grade 7 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 12 64 77 23 17 64 80 20 18 65 82 18
Female 15 69 85 15 21 65 86 14 23 63 86 14
Male 10 60 70 30 13 63 76 24 14 66 80 20
Asian < < < < < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Black < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < < <
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < < <
White 13 63 77 23 17 63 80 20 19 64 83 17
Multiple Races < < < < < < < < < < < <
Students with Disabilities 11 21 32 68 10 31 41 59 8 27 35 65
Students without Disabilities 13 68 81 19 18 68 86 14 19 69 88 12
Economically Disadvantaged 6 62 68 32 12 58 70 30 12 57 69 31
Not Economically Disadvantaged 16 66 82 18 20 68 88 12 22 70 92 8
English Learners < < < < < < 100 0
Homeless < < < < < < 100 0 < < < <
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Foster Care < < 100 0 < < < <
Grade 8 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 10 55 65 35 10 68 78 22 12 66 78 22
Female 14 61 75 25 11 74 85 15 14 73 87 13
Male 7 51 58 42 8 63 72 28 10 61 72 28
Asian < < < < < < 100 0
Black < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
White 10 56 66 34 10 68 78 22 12 66 78 22
Multiple Races < < < < < < 100 0 < < < <
Students with Disabilities - 14 14 86 14 29 43 57 7 33 41 59
Students without Disabilities 11 60 70 30 9 72 81 19 12 70 83 17
Economically Disadvantaged 2 46 48 52 5 65 70 30 11 65 76 24
Not Economically Disadvantaged 14 61 76 24 13 71 83 17 12 67 80 20
Homeless < < 100 0 < < < <
Military Connected < < < < < < 100 0
Foster Care < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Grade 3 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Grade 4 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Grade 5 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
EOC English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Writing Performance: All Students

This chart displays the percentage of students passing state writing tests. Virginia students are assessed in writing in grade 8 and once in most high schools with a state end-of-course (EOC) writing test. If a high school administers a locally developed writing assessment, results are not included in this chart as scores on locally developed writing assessments are not reported to the Virginia Department of Education. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view results for a specific test. Use the menu below the chart to select results for a specific group of students. Practice test items representative of the content and skills included in current Standards of Learning assessments are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.
English Writing Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 11 51 63 37 19 53 71 29 19 51 70 30
Female 20 61 81 19 25 58 83 17 34 51 85 15
Male 5 44 48 52 13 48 61 39 8 51 59 41
Asian < < 100 0
Black < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
White 12 52 65 35 19 53 72 28 18 51 70 30
Multiple Races < < < < < < < < < < < <
Students with Disabilities - 14 14 86 9 14 23 77 7 18 25 75
Students without Disabilities 12 55 67 33 20 57 77 23 21 55 76 24
Economically Disadvantaged 8 38 46 54 15 46 60 40 14 47 61 39
Not Economically Disadvantaged 14 59 73 27 22 58 80 20 22 54 76 24
Homeless < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < < <
Military Connected < < < < < < < <
Foster Care < < < <
Grade 8 Writing Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 11 51 63 37 19 53 71 29 19 51 70 30
Female 20 61 81 19 25 58 83 17 34 51 85 15
Male 5 44 48 52 13 48 61 39 8 51 59 41
Asian < < 100 0
Black < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
White 12 52 65 35 19 53 72 28 18 51 70 30
Multiple Races < < < < < < < < < < < <
Students with Disabilities - 14 14 86 9 14 23 77 7 18 25 75
Students without Disabilities 12 55 67 33 20 57 77 23 21 55 76 24
Economically Disadvantaged 8 38 46 54 15 46 60 40 14 47 61 39
Not Economically Disadvantaged 14 59 73 27 22 58 80 20 22 54 76 24
Homeless < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < < <
Military Connected < < < < < < < <
Foster Care < < < <
EOC Writing Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Math Performance: All Students

This chart displays the percentage of students passing state mathematics tests. Virginia students are assessed annually in mathematics in grades 3-8 and at the end of secondary courses (Algebra I, Geometry and Algebra II) as needed to meet graduation requirements. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view results for a specific test. Use the menu below the chart to select results for a specific group of students. Practice test items representative of the content and skills included in current Standards of Learning assessments are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.
Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 12 65 77 23 13 64 76 24 15 62 77 23
Female 16 69 84 16 15 66 81 19 16 69 85 15
Male 8 63 71 29 11 62 73 27 14 57 71 29
American Indian < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Asian < < 100 0 < < < < < < 100 0
Black < < < < 8 62 69 31 < < < <
Hispanic 13 67 80 20 18 68 86 14 6 61 67 33
White 12 65 77 23 13 64 77 23 15 62 77 23
Multiple Races 6 63 69 31 15 38 54 46 20 60 80 20
Students with Disabilities 9 25 34 66 10 24 33 67 12 23 36 64
Students without Disabilities 12 70 82 18 13 68 81 19 15 67 82 18
Economically Disadvantaged 6 59 65 35 10 54 64 36 10 56 66 34
Not Economically Disadvantaged 16 70 85 15 15 71 86 14 19 67 85 15
English Learners < < < < < < 100 0 < < < <
Homeless < < < < < < < < - 40 40 60
Military Connected 21 71 93 7 < < 100 0
Foster Care < < < < < < < <
Grade 6 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 19 66 85 15 21 65 86 14 19 63 82 18
Female 25 65 91 9 23 66 89 11 25 66 91 9
Male 14 67 80 20 20 64 84 16 15 61 75 25
American Indian < < 100 0
Black < < 100 0 < < < < < < < <
Hispanic < < 100 0 < < < < < < < <
White 19 66 85 15 20 67 88 12 20 63 83 17
Multiple Races < < < < < < < < < < < <
Students with Disabilities 22 30 52 48 - 36 36 64 11 39 50 50
Students without Disabilities 19 71 89 11 23 68 91 9 20 66 86 14
Economically Disadvantaged 13 64 77 23 17 61 77 23 13 56 70 30
Not Economically Disadvantaged 24 67 91 9 24 68 92 8 24 68 92 8
English Learners < < 100 0 < < < <
Homeless < < 100 0 < < < < < < < <
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Foster Care < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Grade 7 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 8 59 68 32 11 57 67 33 16 61 77 23
Female 9 62 71 29 14 58 72 28 16 63 79 21
Male 8 57 65 35 8 55 63 37 17 59 75 25
Asian < < 100 0 < < < < < < 100 0
Black < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < < <
Hispanic < < < < < < 100 0 < < < <
White 8 59 67 33 10 56 67 33 16 62 78 22
Multiple Races < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
Students with Disabilities - 32 32 68 14 17 31 69 4 15 19 81
Students without Disabilities 9 62 71 29 10 62 72 28 18 66 84 16
Economically Disadvantaged 2 46 48 52 10 42 51 49 10 55 65 35
Not Economically Disadvantaged 13 68 81 19 11 68 80 20 21 65 86 14
English Learners < < < < < < 100 0
Homeless < < < < < < 100 0 < < < <
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Foster Care < < < < < < < <
Grade 8 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 3 69 72 28 2 67 69 31 6 60 65 35
Female 5 83 88 12 2 74 77 23 3 76 78 22
Male 1 60 61 39 2 61 63 37 7 50 57 43
Asian < < 100 0
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
White 3 70 73 27 2 66 68 32 6 59 65 35
Multiple Races < < < < < < < < < < < <
Students with Disabilities - 14 14 86 15 15 30 70 22 15 37 63
Students without Disabilities 3 76 79 21 1 74 74 26 3 67 70 30
Economically Disadvantaged - 66 66 34 2 56 58 42 5 53 58 42
Not Economically Disadvantaged 5 72 77 23 2 77 79 21 6 64 71 29
Homeless < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < < <
Military Connected < < < < < < 100 0
Foster Care < < 100 0
Algebra I Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 15 85 100 0 16 82 98 2 20 76 96 4
Female 25 75 100 0 21 75 96 4 18 79 97 3
Male 6 94 100 0 9 91 100 0 23 73 95 5
Black < < 100 0
Hispanic < < 100 0 < < 100 0
White 15 85 100 0 13 85 98 2 20 76 96 4
Multiple Races < < 100 0
Students without Disabilities 15 85 100 0 16 82 98 2 20 76 96 4
Economically Disadvantaged < < 100 0 8 83 92 8 7 79 86 14
Not Economically Disadvantaged 14 86 100 0 18 82 100 0 24 76 100 0
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Geometry Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 44 56 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Female 50 50 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Male < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
White 44 56 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Students without Disabilities 44 56 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Economically Disadvantaged < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Not Economically Disadvantaged 47 53 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Grade 3 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Grade 4 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Grade 5 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Algebra II Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Science Performance: All Students

This chart displays the percentage of students passing state science tests. Virginia students are assessed in science in grades 5 and 8 and at the end of secondary courses (Earth Science, Biology and Chemistry) as needed to meet graduation requirements. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view results for a specific test. Use the menu below the chart to select results for a specific group of students. Practice test items representative of the content and skills included in current Standards of Learning assessments are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.
Science Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 8 62 71 29 11 64 76 24 17 60 77 23
Female 11 70 82 18 8 71 79 21 19 60 79 21
Male 6 56 62 38 14 59 72 28 16 59 75 25
Asian < < < < < < 100 0
Black < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
White 9 63 72 28 12 64 75 25 18 59 76 24
Multiple Races < < < < < < 100 0 < < < <
Students with Disabilities - 18 18 82 10 33 43 57 15 26 41 59
Students without Disabilities 9 67 76 24 11 67 79 21 17 64 81 19
Economically Disadvantaged 3 51 54 46 6 57 63 37 12 57 69 31
Not Economically Disadvantaged 11 70 81 19 15 70 85 15 20 62 82 18
Homeless < < 100 0 < < < < < < < <
Military Connected < < < < < < < <
Foster Care < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Grade 8 Science Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 8 62 71 29 11 64 76 24 17 60 77 23
Female 11 70 82 18 8 71 79 21 19 60 79 21
Male 6 56 62 38 14 59 72 28 16 59 75 25
Asian < < < < < < 100 0
Black < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
White 9 63 72 28 12 64 75 25 18 59 76 24
Multiple Races < < < < < < 100 0 < < < <
Students with Disabilities - 18 18 82 10 33 43 57 15 26 41 59
Students without Disabilities 9 67 76 24 11 67 79 21 17 64 81 19
Economically Disadvantaged 3 51 54 46 6 57 63 37 12 57 69 31
Not Economically Disadvantaged 11 70 81 19 15 70 85 15 21 62 82 18
Homeless < < 100 0 < < < < < < < <
Military Connected < < < < < < < <
Foster Care < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Earth Science Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students < < 100 0
Male < < 100 0
White < < 100 0
Students without Disabilities < < 100 0
Not Economically Disadvantaged < < 100 0
Grade 5 Science Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Biology Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Chemistry Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

History Performance: All Students

This chart displays the percentage of students passing state tests in history/social science. Virginia students are assessed in history/social science once in elementary school (Virginia Studies), once in middle school (Civics and Economics) and at the end of secondary courses (Geography, World History I, World History II and Virginia and United States History) as needed to meet graduation requirements. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view results for a specific test. Use the menu below the chart to select results for a specific group of students. Practice test items representative of the content and skills included in current Standards of Learning assessments are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.
History Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 18 61 79 21 20 64 83 17 21 56 77 23
Female 19 71 90 10 21 67 88 12 23 60 83 17
Male 18 53 71 29 19 61 80 20 20 53 73 27
Asian < < < < < < 100 0
Black < < 100 0 < < < < < < 100 0
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
White 19 61 80 20 20 64 84 16 21 56 77 23
Multiple Races < < < < < < 100 0 < < < <
Students with Disabilities 9 17 26 74 5 43 48 52 4 33 37 63
Students without Disabilities 20 66 85 15 21 66 87 13 23 59 82 18
Economically Disadvantaged 7 57 63 37 10 66 76 24 16 54 70 30
Not Economically Disadvantaged 26 64 89 11 26 62 89 11 24 58 82 18
Homeless < < 100 0 < < < < < < < <
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Foster Care < < 100 0
World History I Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students < < < < < < < < < < < <
Male < < < < < < < < < < < <
White < < < < < < < <
Students with Disabilities < < < < < < < < < < < <
Not Economically Disadvantaged < < < < < < < < < < < <
Geography Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < < <
Female < < 100 0 < < < <
Male < < 100 0
White < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < < <
Students without Disabilities < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < < <
Not Economically Disadvantaged < < 100 0 < < < <
Civics & Econ Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 19 61 80 20 20 64 83 17 21 56 77 23
Female 19 71 90 10 20 67 87 13 23 60 83 17
Male 18 53 71 29 19 61 80 20 20 53 73 27
Asian < < < < < < 100 0
Black < < 100 0 < < < < < < 100 0
Hispanic < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
White 19 61 80 20 20 64 84 16 21 56 77 23
Multiple Races < < < < < < 100 0 < < < <
Students with Disabilities 9 18 27 73 - 41 41 59 - 20 20 80
Students without Disabilities 20 65 85 15 21 66 87 13 23 59 83 17
Economically Disadvantaged 7 57 63 37 10 66 75 25 16 53 69 31
Not Economically Disadvantaged 26 64 90 10 27 63 89 11 25 58 83 17
Homeless < < 100 0 < < < < < < < <
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Foster Care < < 100 0
VA & US History Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
World History II Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
VA Studies Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Number of Recently Arrived English Language Learners Exempted From State Reading Assessments

2016-20172017-20182018-2019
School---
Division896
State4,2272,7623,719
Number of Recently Arrived English Language Learners Exempted From State Reading Assessments

Virginia Alternate Assessment Program Participation Rates

Reading
Subject Area Number of Students Taking VAAP Tests Total Number of Students Percent of Students Taking VAAP Tests
Number and percentage of students participating in the Virginia Alternate Assessment Program.

Enrollment

Fall Membership by Grade

Grade 2017-20182018-20192019-2020
Grade 6240246219
Grade 7244242248
Grade 8230252239
Total Students714740706

< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Fall Membership by Subgroups

2019 Fall Membership By Subgroup: Racial and Ethnic Groups

The Virginia Department of Education annually collects statistics on the number of students enrolled in public schools on September 30.  Student counts are reported by grade assignment, race, ethnicity, disability, English proficiency, and economic status. The collection of race and ethnicity information as specified by the U.S. Department of Education is required for eligibility for federal education funds and for accountability reports. A student is reported as economically disadvantaged if he or she meets any one of the following criteria:
  • Is eligible for Free/Reduced Meals;
  • Receives Temporary Assistance for Needy Families;
  • Is eligible for Medicaid; or
  • Is a migrant or is experiencing homelessness.
.
Fall Membership by Subgroup
Subgroup 2017-20182018-20192019-2020
All Students714740706
Female327320307
Male387420399
American Indian111
Asian433
Black13912
Hispanic181816
White665694659
Multiple Races131515
Students with Disabilities657363
Students without Disabilities649667643
Economically Disadvantaged298303275
Not Economically Disadvantaged416437431
English Learners456
Not English Learners710735700
Homeless184
Military Connected141011
Foster Care267
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Finance

Per-Pupil Spending

2018-2019 Per-Pupil Spending

The per-pupil expenditure calculations exclude expenditures that are not directly related to educational services provided to students in pre-kindergarten classes as well as in grades K-12. Excluded expenditures include adult education, community services, non-regular school day programs, capital purchases, debt service, food services, and fund transfers.

Per-Pupil Expenditures School Division State
End-of-Year Average Daily Membership
School-Level Expenditures Per-Pupil
Federal
State/Local
Total
Division-Level Expenditures Per-Pupil
Federal
State/Local
Total
Total Per-Pupil Expenditures
Expenditure Summary
Excluded from Per-Pupil Formula
Total Expenditures

Learning Climate

Chronic Absenteeism

Chronic Absenteeism 2018-2019 School Year:

Daily attendance is critical to success in school. A student is considered chronically absent if he or she misses two or more instructional days per month (18 days, or 10 percent of a 180-day school year) regardless of whether the absences are excused or unexcused. According to the U.S. Department of Education:
  • Children who are chronically absent in preschool, kindergarten, and first grade are much less likely to read on grade level by the third grade.
  • Students who can't read at grade level by the third grade are four times more likely to drop out of high school.
  • By high school, regular attendance is a better dropout indicator than test scores.
  • A student who is chronically absent in any year between the eighth and twelfth grade is seven times more likely to drop out of school.
Absenteeism by Subgroup
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Subgroup Below 10% 10% or Above Below 10% 10% or Above Below 10% 10% or Above
All Students649766318565281
Female289392844327534
Male360373474237747
American Indian<<<<<<
Asian<<<<<<
Black100121<<
Hispanic141191171
Native Hawaiian<<----
White608735838261178
Multiple Races132121122
Students with Disabilities655628685
Economically Disadvantaged240542476625062
English Learners<<<<<<
Homeless<<<<410
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Standards of Accreditation (SOA) Offenses Data

2018-2019 Offenses
  Number of Offenses
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Offenses 29
Disorderly or Disruptive Behavior Offenses 20
Other Offenses Against Persons 66
All Other Offenses 17
Property Offenses <
Offenses Against Staff <
Offenses Against Student <

< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Short-Term Suspensions

Short-Term Suspensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time. A short-term suspension (10 days of less) may be imposed by a principal, an assistant principal, or a designee teacher in the principal’s absence. The principal or assistant principal must tell the student of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his version of what occurred. Notice to the parent may be oral or written, depending on local school board policy, and must include information on the length of the suspension, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired.  A parent may ask for a short-term suspension decision to be reviewed by the superintendent or his designee. Local school board policy will determine whether the superintendent’s decision is final or can be appealed to the local school board. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.
Short-Term Suspensions
  2016-20172017-20182018-2019
Subgroup % Population% Short-Term Suspensions% Population% Short-Term Suspensions% Population% Short-Term Suspensions
American Indian--0.10.1
Asian0.30.60.4
Black1.21.81.20.9
Hispanic2.32.55.42.46.2
Native Hawaiian0.1----
White93.388.993.186.593.890.3
Multiple Races2.711.11.88.122.7
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Long-Term Suspensions

Long-Term Supensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time. A long-term suspension (more than 10 school days and less than 365 calendar days)  is usually imposed by a disciplinary hearing officer upon recommendation of a principal. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred. Notice to the parent (and child) must be in writing and must include information on the length of and reason for the suspension, the right to a hearing in accordance with local school board policy, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired or to attend an appropriate alternative education program approved by the school board during the suspension or after the suspension period expires. Costs for any community-based educational programs or alternative programs that are not part of the program offered by the school division are the financial responsibility of the parent. A parent has the right to appeal a long-term suspension decision in accordance with local school board policy. The appeal may first go to the local superintendent or his or her designee or to a sub-committee of the local school board; final appeal is to the full school board. The appeal must be decided by the school board within 30 days. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.
Long-Term Suspensions
  2016-20172017-20182018-2019
Subgroup % Population% Long-Term Suspensions% Population% Long-Term Suspensions% Population% Long-Term Suspensions
American Indian0.10.1
Asian0.30.60.4
Black1.21.81.2
Hispanic2.32.52.4
Native Hawaiian0.1
White93.310093.193.8
Multiple Races2.71.82
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Expulsions

Expulsions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time. An expulsion (removal from school for 365 calendar days) may only be imposed by a local school board. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred.  The parent (and child) must be noticed in writing of the proposed expulsion, the reasons the expulsion is being proposed, and of the right to a hearing before the school board or a sub-committee of the school board, depending on local policy. If the student is expelled, the parent is sent a written notification of the length of the expulsion and information on the availability of community-based educational, training, and intervention programs. The notice must state whether the student is eligible to return to regular school or to attend an approved alternative education program or an adult education program offered during or after the period of expulsion. The student may apply for readmission to be effective one calendar year from the date of his or her expulsion. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.
Expulsions
  2016-20172017-20182018-2019
Subgroup % Population% Expulsions% Population% Expulsions% Population% Expulsions
American Indian--0.10.1
Asian0.30.60.4
Black1.21.81.2
Hispanic2.32.52.4
Native Hawaiian0.1----
White93.393.110093.8
Multiple Races2.71.82
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility:

School divisions that choose to take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated commodities from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal they serve. In return, they must serve lunches that meet Federal requirements, and they must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children. The School Breakfast Program operates by supporting breakfasts in the same manner as the National School Lunch Program.   At the beginning of each school year, letters and meal applications are distributed to households of children attending school. This letter informs households that school nutrition programs are available and that free and reduced-price meals are available based on income criteria. Applications have been eliminated totally in divisions that implement the community eligibility provision for all schools within the division. Children from families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the poverty level are eligible for free meals. Those between 130 percent and 185 percent of the poverty level are eligible for reduced-price meals, for which students can be charged no more than 40 cents for lunch and 30 cents for breakfast. All other students pay the full price for meals. See the Virginia Department of Education website for more information about school nutrition programs.
Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility
  2017-20182018-20192019-2020
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 43.841.339.8
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students :

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Breakfast Program. The School Breakfast Program is a federally assisted meal program that provides nutritious breakfast meals to students. The Virginia Department of Education administers the program at the state level and school divisions administer the program at the local level. Participation in the School Breakfast Program has been linked increased achievement, reduced absenteeism and tardiness, fewer disciplinary problems, and better student health. Breakfast menus must provide one-fourth of the daily recommended levels for protein, calcium, iron, Vitamin A, Vitamin C and calories. Participating schools must serve breakfasts that meet Federal nutrition standards – one quarter of daily recommended levels of protein, calcium, iron, vitamins A and C and calories – and must provide free and reduced-price breakfasts to eligible children. The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.  
Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation
  2017-20182018-20192019-2020
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 55.965.867.9
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students:

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Lunch Program. School divisions that take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated food items from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal served. In return, schools must serve lunches that meet federal requirements, and must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children. Studies show that well-nourished students are better learners. The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.  
Free and Reduced Lunch Participation
  2017-20182018-20192019-2020
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 73.17371.9
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Civil Rights Data Collection

The Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) is a survey of all public schools and school districts in the United States. The CRDC includes data on student access to courses, programs, staff, and resources relevant to educational equity and opportunity for students.​

The U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights reports information collected through the CRDC in carrying out its mission “to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence throughout the nation through vigorous enforcement of civil rights.”​

More information about the Civil Rights Data Collection is available on the Virginia Department of Education website.

2015-2016 school data (CSV)
2015-2016 school data (Excel)
Code Book
User Guide
Usage Agreement

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality All Schools
Poverty Level Out-of-Field Teachers Inexperienced Teachers Out-of-Field and Inexperienced Teachers

< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

This table reports the percentages of teachers who are teaching out of field (not fully endorsed for the content they are teaching) or who are inexperienced (less than one year of classroom experience). Percentages are reported for Title I schools, non-Title I schools, all schools and for high-poverty and low-poverty schools.

Provisionally Licensed Teachers

Provisionally Licensed Teachers
  Poverty Level All Teachers Special Education Teachers

< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

This table reports the percentages of all teachers and special education teachers who are teaching with a provisional license.

Teacher Educational Attainment

Teacher Educational Attainment: 2019-2020

No additional explanation available.
Teacher Educational Attainment
  Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Doctoral Degree Other
2017-201844%53%2%1%
2018-201947%50%1%2%
2019-202049%49%0%2%
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Every Student Succeeds Act

2020 ESSA Status: Not Identified for Support and Improvement
2020 Accreditation Status: Accreditation Waived

2020-2021 ESSA status is based on 2018-2019 performance due to the cancellation of spring 2020 state assessments and in accordance with Virginia’s accountability waiver as approved by the U.S. Department of Education.

+ View 2019 ESSA School Quality Indicator Summary and related reports

Beverley Manor Middle to top