Skip to Content
Agencies | Governor (opens new window)
Search Virginia.Gov (opens new window)

Antietam Elementary

General school information

Category: Elementary (PK-05) School
Phone: 703-497-7619
Address: 12000 Antietam Rd Woodbridge, VA 22192
Principal: Marcia Wieduwilt
Superintendent: Dr. Steven L. Walts
Region: 4
Division: Prince William County Public Schools
Division Website (opens new window)

Map results may not reflect school division or attendance zone boundaries.

Accreditation

Performance Snapshot

Assessments

Assessments

Enrollment

Enrollment

Finance

School Finance

Learning Climate

Learning Climate

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality

ESSA

Every Student Succeeds Act

State Accreditation Status

Accredited

Reward School Status


ACCREDITATION

Accreditation Status This Year: Accredited
Annual Waiver: 2016 through 2018

School Quality Indicators

Academic Achievement

English Level One
Mathematics Level One
Science Level One

Achievement Gaps

EnglishLevel One
MathematicsLevel One

Student engagement & Outcomes

Chronic Absenteeism Level One

Accredited: All indicators at Level One or Level Two or Waiver
Accredited With Conditions: One or more indicators at Level Three
Accreditation Denied: Under State Sanction

Achievement Gaps: English and Mathematics

Reporting on the achievement and progress of student groups allows schools to identify learners in need of additional support and resources.

Student Group Achievement Gap - English Achievement Gap - Math
Asian Level One Level One
Black Level One Level One
Economically Disadvantaged Level One Level One
English Learners Level One Level One
Hispanic Level One Level One
Students with Disabilities Level One Level One
White Level One Level One

18.28% of the students in this school were chronically absent.

Assessments

Student Achievement by Proficiency Level

Reading

Reading Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia students are assessed annually in reading in grades 3-8 and once in high school with an end-of-course reading test. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view the results for a specific reading test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s English Standards of Learning prepare students to participate in society as literate citizens, equipped with the ability to communicate effectively in their communities, in the workplace, and in postsecondary education. As students progress, they become active and involved listeners and develop a full command of the English language, evidenced by their use of standard English and their growing spoken and written vocabularies.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 24 84 60 16 27 83 55 17 24 78 55 22
Female 22 89 66 11 25 84 60 16 22 81 59 19
Male 25 79 54 21 31 81 50 19 26 74 49 26
Asian 25 88 63 13 25 88 63 13 33 89 56 11
Black 16 77 61 23 20 80 61 20 22 71 49 29
Hispanic 23 80 58 20 18 81 62 19 16 75 59 25
White 27 90 63 10 38 84 46 16 31 85 54 15
Two or more races 30 75 45 25 28 88 60 12 12 72 60 28
Students with Disabilities 36 79 43 21 36 70 34 30 22 49 27 51
Students without Disabilities 23 84 61 16 26 85 59 15 24 83 59 17
Economically Disadvantaged 13 74 61 26 15 76 62 24 12 64 52 36
Not Economically Disadvantaged 29 88 59 12 34 86 52 14 31 87 56 13
English Learners 11 71 60 29 16 76 60 24 15 66 51 34
Grade 3 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 20 82 61 18 27 73 47 27 31 78 47 22
Female 18 85 67 15 27 77 50 23 31 77 46 23
Male 23 77 55 23 26 69 43 31 31 79 48 21
Asian 27 82 55 18 < < < < 58 92 33 8
Black 14 86 71 14 22 72 50 28 23 65 42 35
Hispanic 12 76 64 24 12 69 58 31 29 71 42 29
White 30 84 55 16 35 73 38 27 36 92 56 8
Two or more races < < < < 40 90 50 10 < < < <
Students with Disabilities < < < < 37 68 32 32 45 55 9 45
Students without Disabilities 21 83 62 17 24 75 51 25 29 80 51 20
Economically Disadvantaged 5 68 62 32 12 68 56 32 18 55 38 45
Not Economically Disadvantaged 27 88 61 12 34 77 42 23 38 90 52 10
English Learners 9 61 52 39 11 68 58 32 35 69 35 31
Grade 4 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 23 83 60 17 29 83 53 18 20 74 54 26
Female 24 89 64 11 25 84 58 16 20 81 61 19
Male 22 78 57 22 34 81 47 19 19 64 45 36
Asian 25 100 75 0 9 82 73 18 < < < <
Black 16 63 47 37 24 79 55 21 18 68 50 32
Hispanic 19 81 62 19 18 79 61 21 13 71 58 29
White 24 92 68 8 45 86 41 14 28 75 47 25
Two or more races < < < < < < < < 20 80 60 20
Students with Disabilities < < < < 31 69 38 31 22 43 22 57
Students without Disabilities 21 83 62 17 29 85 56 15 19 82 63 18
Economically Disadvantaged 16 81 66 19 14 76 62 24 12 60 48 40
Not Economically Disadvantaged 27 84 58 16 36 86 49 14 25 83 58 17
English Learners 10 76 67 24 14 71 57 29 9 61 52 39
Grade 5 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 29 86 57 14 26 92 66 8 20 83 63 17
Female 26 93 67 7 22 94 73 6 14 86 71 14
Male 31 81 50 19 31 90 60 10 26 79 53 21
Asian < < < < 36 100 64 0 < < < <
Black 18 77 59 23 11 89 79 11 23 77 55 23
Hispanic 36 84 48 16 26 96 70 4 7 83 77 17
White 27 95 68 5 32 92 61 8 30 88 58 13
Two or more races < < < < < < < < < < < <
Students with Disabilities 50 83 33 17 < < < < 7 53 47 47
Students without Disabilities 26 87 61 13 24 94 69 6 22 87 65 13
Economically Disadvantaged 19 75 56 25 18 85 67 15 7 77 70 23
Not Economically Disadvantaged 33 91 58 9 31 97 66 3 28 86 58 14
English Learners 14 76 62 24 21 86 64 14 - 67 67 33
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Math

Math Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students assessed in mathematics in grades 3-8 and at the end of the following secondary mathematics courses: Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select a specific mathematics test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

The content of the Standards of Learning for mathematics supports the following five goals for students: becoming mathematical problem solvers, communicating mathematically, reasoning mathematically, making mathematical connections, and using mathematical representations to model and interpret practical situations.

Throughout a student’s mathematics schooling from kindergarten through grade eight, specific content strands or topics are included. These content strands are Number and Number Sense; Computation and Estimation; Measurement; Geometry; Probability and Statistics; and Patterns, Functions, and Algebra. The Standards of Learning for each strand progress in complexity at each grade level and throughout the high school courses.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Math Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 27 85 58 15 27 80 53 20 29 77 48 23
Female 26 88 62 12 22 77 55 23 24 79 55 21
Male 29 83 55 17 33 84 51 16 35 74 40 26
Asian 31 94 63 6 31 97 66 3 37 89 52 11
Black 16 76 60 24 13 68 55 32 24 67 43 33
Hispanic 20 84 64 16 21 75 55 25 22 77 56 23
White 38 93 56 7 37 87 50 13 37 82 46 18
Two or more races 30 65 35 35 32 76 44 24 28 72 44 28
Students with Disabilities 43 79 36 21 32 64 32 36 33 53 20 47
Students without Disabilities 26 86 60 14 26 83 56 17 28 81 53 19
Economically Disadvantaged 12 75 63 25 17 68 51 32 16 65 50 35
Not Economically Disadvantaged 35 90 56 10 32 86 54 14 37 84 47 16
English Learners 15 80 65 20 18 75 57 25 19 72 53 28
Grade 3 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 32 85 54 15 30 82 52 18 37 78 41 22
Female 31 87 56 13 33 79 46 21 34 78 45 22
Male 32 83 51 17 26 86 60 14 42 77 35 23
Asian 18 100 82 0 < < < < 58 92 33 8
Black 29 82 54 18 20 75 55 25 38 62 23 38
Hispanic 16 80 64 20 23 85 62 15 32 81 48 19
White 48 93 45 7 35 84 49 16 42 83 42 17
Two or more races < < < < 50 80 30 20 < < < <
Students with Disabilities < < < < 32 63 32 37 55 55 - 45
Students without Disabilities 32 86 53 14 30 86 57 14 35 80 45 20
Economically Disadvantaged 11 78 68 22 17 74 57 26 18 58 40 43
Not Economically Disadvantaged 42 88 47 12 37 86 49 14 48 89 41 11
English Learners 9 83 74 17 15 85 70 15 31 73 42 27
Grade 4 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 25 89 64 11 26 80 54 20 22 78 55 22
Female 24 91 67 9 17 77 61 23 20 81 61 19
Male 25 86 61 14 38 83 45 17 25 73 48 27
Asian 50 100 50 0 9 100 91 0 < < < <
Black 5 74 68 26 14 76 62 24 18 73 55 27
Hispanic 24 90 67 10 19 70 52 30 13 81 69 19
White 32 95 62 5 41 86 45 14 28 78 50 22
Two or more races < < < < < < < < 40 80 40 20
Students with Disabilities < < < < 31 69 38 31 26 57 30 43
Students without Disabilities 24 89 65 11 25 82 56 18 21 83 62 17
Economically Disadvantaged 19 84 66 16 11 61 50 39 12 77 65 23
Not Economically Disadvantaged 28 91 63 9 33 88 55 12 30 78 48 22
English Learners 24 81 57 19 19 70 52 30 17 75 58 25
Grade 5 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 25 83 58 17 26 79 53 21 27 76 49 24
Female 21 86 65 14 17 75 58 25 17 78 60 22
Male 28 81 53 19 34 83 49 17 38 74 36 26
Asian < < < < 50 100 50 0 < 100 < 0
Black 9 70 61 30 5 50 45 50 16 68 52 32
Hispanic 21 83 63 17 21 71 50 29 20 70 50 30
White 31 92 61 8 34 89 55 11 40 85 45 15
Two or more races < < < < < < < < < < < <
Students with Disabilities 58 75 17 25 < < < < 27 47 20 53
Students without Disabilities 20 84 64 16 25 81 56 19 27 80 53 20
Economically Disadvantaged 6 63 56 38 23 70 48 30 18 61 43 39
Not Economically Disadvantaged 34 93 59 7 28 85 57 15 32 85 53 15
English Learners 14 76 62 24 20 73 53 27 8 67 58 33
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Science

Science Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students are assessed in science in grades 5 and 8 and at the end of the following secondary courses: Earth Science, Biology, and Chemistry. Before 2014, students also were assessed in science in grade 4. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select results for a specific science test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s Science Standards of Learning identify academic content for essential components of the science curriculum at different grade levels. Standards are identified for kindergarten through grade five, for middle school, and for a core set of high school courses — Earth Science, Biology, Chemistry, and Physics. Throughout a student’s science schooling from kindergarten through grade six, content strands, or topics are included. The Standards of Learning in each strand progress in complexity as they are studied at various grade levels in grades K-6, and are represented indirectly throughout the high school courses.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Science Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 33 89 56 11 18 83 64 17 24 85 61 15
Female 30 93 64 7 13 81 67 19 21 86 65 14
Male 36 86 50 14 23 85 62 15 28 85 57 15
Asian < 100 < 0 29 86 57 14 < 100 < 0
Black 9 78 70 22 - 65 65 35 23 77 55 23
Hispanic 33 92 58 8 17 74 57 26 20 83 63 17
White 41 92 51 8 26 95 68 5 28 90 63 10
Two or more races < < < < < 100 < 0 < < < <
Students with Disabilities 46 85 38 15 < < < < 27 73 47 27
Students without Disabilities 31 90 58 10 19 84 65 16 24 87 63 13
Economically Disadvantaged 9 81 72 19 18 69 51 31 14 77 64 23
Not Economically Disadvantaged 44 93 49 7 18 91 72 9 31 90 60 10
English Learners 19 86 67 14 14 72 59 28 4 79 75 21
Grade 5 Science Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 33 89 56 11 18 83 64 17 24 85 61 15
Female 30 93 64 7 13 81 67 19 21 86 65 14
Male 36 86 50 14 23 85 62 15 28 85 57 15
Asian < 100 < 0 29 86 57 14 < 100 < 0
Black 9 78 70 22 - 65 65 35 23 77 55 23
Hispanic 33 92 58 8 17 74 57 26 20 83 63 17
White 41 92 51 8 26 95 68 5 28 90 63 10
Two or more races < < < < < 100 < 0 < < < <
Students with Disabilities 46 85 38 15 < < < < 27 73 47 27
Students without Disabilities 31 90 58 10 19 84 65 16 24 87 63 13
Economically Disadvantaged 9 81 72 19 18 69 51 31 14 77 64 23
Not Economically Disadvantaged 44 93 49 7 18 91 72 9 31 90 60 10
English Learners 19 86 67 14 14 72 59 28 4 79 75 21
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

History

History Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students are assessed in history and social science following instruction in Virginia Studies in elementary school, Civics and Economics in middle school, and at the conclusion of the following secondary courses: World History and Geography to 1500, World History and Geography 1500 to the Present, World Geography, and Virginia and U.S. History. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select a specific history or social science test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s History and Social Science Standards of Learning are designed to

  • develop the knowledge and skills of history, geography, civics, and economics that enable students to place the people, ideas, and events that have shaped our state and our nation in perspective;
  • instill in students a thoughtful pride in the history of America through an understanding that what “We the People of the United States” launched more than two centuries ago was not a perfect union, but a continual effort to build a “more perfect” union, one which has become the world’s most successful example of constitutional self-government;
  • enable students to understand the basic values, principles, and operation of American constitutional democracy;
  • prepare students for informed, responsible, and participatory citizenship;
  • develop students’ skills in debate, discussion, and writing; and
  • provide students with a framework for continuing education in history and the social sciences.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: History Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 65 98 33 2 53 92 39 8 51 89 38 11
Female 60 100 40 0 45 89 44 11 53 88 36 12
Male 69 96 27 4 62 94 32 6 49 89 40 11
Asian 83 100 17 0 73 100 27 0 < 100 < 0
Black 42 95 53 5 41 86 45 14 55 86 32 14
Hispanic 48 95 48 5 41 89 48 11 42 81 39 19
White 81 100 19 0 59 93 34 7 53 92 39 8
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 80 100 20 0
Students with Disabilities < 100 < 0 56 81 25 19 35 74 39 26
Students without Disabilities 64 98 34 2 52 93 41 7 55 93 37 7
Economically Disadvantaged 53 94 41 6 33 81 47 19 31 83 52 17
Not Economically Disadvantaged 70 100 30 0 61 96 35 4 64 92 28 8
English Learners 62 100 38 0 48 89 41 11 30 87 57 13
VA Studies Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 64 98 34 2 51 91 40 9 50 88 39 12
Female 60 100 40 0 44 89 45 11 51 88 37 12
Male 67 96 29 4 61 94 33 6 48 89 41 11
Asian 83 100 17 0 73 100 27 0 < 100 < 0
Black 39 94 56 6 41 86 45 14 47 84 37 16
Hispanic 50 95 45 5 38 88 50 12 40 80 40 20
White 81 100 19 0 58 93 35 7 53 92 39 8
Two or more races < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 80 100 20 0
Students with Disabilities < 100 < 0 42 75 33 25 22 67 44 33
Students without Disabilities 64 98 34 2 52 93 41 7 55 93 37 7
Economically Disadvantaged 53 93 40 7 33 81 47 19 28 82 54 18
Not Economically Disadvantaged 69 100 31 0 59 96 37 4 63 92 29 8
English Learners 63 100 37 0 46 88 42 12 29 86 57 14
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Number of recently arrived English language learners exempted from state reading assessments

2015-20162016-20172017-2018
State3,4624,2272,762
Division465544285
School021
Number of recently arrived English language learners exempted from state reading assessments

Enrollment

Fall Membership by Grade

Grade 2016-20172017-20182018-2019
Pre-kindergarten121421
Kindergarten10210993
Grade 1110108108
Grade 2110113106
Grade 3102111109
Grade 4121104117
Grade 5106116106
Total Students663675660
Fall Membership by Grade
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

Fall Membership by Subgroups

2018 Fall Membership By Subgroup: Racial and Ethnic Groups

The Virginia Department of Education annually collects statistics on the number of students enrolled in public schools on September 30.  Student counts are reported by grade assignment, race, ethnicity, disability, English proficiency, and economic status.

The collection of race and ethnicity information as specified by the U.S. Department of Education is required for eligibility for federal education funds and for accountability reports.

A student is reported as economically disadvantaged if he or she meets any one of the following criteria:

  • Is eligible for Free/Reduced Meals;
  • Receives Temporary Assistance for Needy Families;
  • Is eligible for Medicaid; or
  • Is a migrant or is experiencing homelessness.

.

Fall Membership by Subgroup
Subgroup 2016-20172017-20182018-2019
All Students663675660
Female348355335
Male315320325
American Indian111
Asian625845
Black141146138
Hispanic165184185
Native Hawaiian411
White245237242
Two or more races454848
Students with Disabilities90110111
Students without Disabilities573565549
Economically Disadvantaged206239206
Not Economically Disadvantaged457436454
English Learners139135134
Not English Learners524540526
Homeless32
Military Connected375063
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

School Finance

Percentage of Expenditures

Division Expenditures

Multiple factors should be considered when comparing the level of school division expenditures for instruction and expenditures for non-instructional costs, such as administration, health services and pupil transportation. These factors include economies of scale, geographic size, and the number of students requiring special services. For example:

  • Smaller school divisions may have similar administrative and support costs as larger divisions but these non-instructional costs are spread over a smaller expenditure base.
  • Geographically large but sparsely populated school divisions may have higher per-pupil transportation costs because of travel distances and mountainous topography.
  • Divisions with large populations of at-risk or special needs students must provide support services that are required or that raise student achievement.
School Division - Percentage of Expenditures
  2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Percentage of fiscal year division
operating expenditures for instructional costs
64.6 64.8 64.7

Statewide Expenditures

The state Board of Education prescribes the following major classifications for expenditures of school funds: instruction; administration, attendance and health; pupil transportation; operation and maintenance; school food services and other non-instructional operations; facilities, debt and fund transfers; technology; and contingency reserves.

Instructional costs include the salaries and benefits paid to teachers, teacher aides, principals, assistant principals, librarians, and guidance counselors; expenditures for textbooks; and expenditures for students to participate in regional and virtual instructional programs.

School State - Percentage of Expenditures
  2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Percentage of fiscal year state
operating expenditures for instructional costs
67.1 66.9 67.2

Sources of Financial Support and Total Per Pupil Expenditures for Operations

Division Per-Pupil Spending

School divisions report annually on expenditures and appropriations to meet each locality’s required local effort in support of the Standards of Quality and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. The amount by which school divisions exceed these required minimums varies based on local decisions and circumstances.

School Quality Profiles for the 2018-2019 school year will include additional information about per-pupil expenditures for the commonwealth, school divisions and schools. VDOE is working with school divisions to gather this information as required under the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015.

Most state support for public education is equalized to reflect each division’s capacity to support the required educational program. The Composite Index of Local Ability-to-Pay determines state and local shares of Standards of Quality costs for each division and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. A portion of state sales tax revenues is distributed in support of public education based on school-age population estimates.

The federal government provides assistance to state and local education agencies in support of specific federal initiatives and mandates, such as instructional services for economically disadvantaged students and students with disabilities.

School Division - Per-Pupil Spending
  Local Funding State Federal
2014-20154,943.005,277.00574.00
2015-20164,918.005,278.00683.00
2016-20175,099.005,499.00759.00

Statewide Per-Pupil Spending

The apportionment of the state funds for public education is the responsibility of the General Assembly, through the Appropriations Act. General fund appropriations serve as the mainstay of state support for the commonwealth’s public schools, augmented by retail sales and use tax revenues, state lottery proceeds, and other sources.

Counties, cities and towns comprising school divisions also support public education by providing the locality’s share to maintain an educational program meeting the commonwealth’s Standards of Quality and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. .

While public education is primarily a state and local responsibility, the federal government provides assistance to state and local education agencies in support of specific federal initiatives and mandates.

School Quality Profiles for the 2018-2019 school year will include additional information about per-pupil expenditures for the commonwealth, school divisions and schools. VDOE is working with school divisions to gather this information as required under the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015.

State - Per-Pupil Spending
  Local Funding State Federal
2014-20155,950.004,802.00771.00
2015-20166,101.004,831.00812.00
2016-20176,268.005,033.00871.00

Learning Climate

Chronic Absenteeism

Chronic Absenteeism 2017-2018 School Year:

Daily attendance is critical to success in school. A student is considered chronically absent if he or she is absent for 10 percent or more of the school year, regardless of whether the absences are excused or unexcused. According to the U.S. Department of Education:

  • Children who are chronically absent in preschool, kindergarten, and first grade are much less likely to read on grade level by the third grade.
  • Students who can’t read at grade level by the third grade are four times more likely to drop out of high school.
  • By high school, regular attendance is a better dropout indicator than test scores.
  • A student who is chronically absent in any year between the eighth and twelfth grade is seven times more likely to drop out of school.

The calculation for chronic absenteeism only includes students enrolled for at least half of the school year.

Absenteeism by Subgroup
2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Subgroup Below 10% 10% or Above Below 10% 10% or Above Below 10% 10% or Above
All Students589535906962649
Female299283223634617
Male290252683328032
American Indian<<<<<<
Asian569567522
Black132101341013511
Hispanic132181422416819
Native Hawaiian<<<<<<
White223122102522514
Two or more races434433443
Students with Disabilities541671178218
Economically Disadvantaged179352013921535
English Learners103251212612617
Homeless<<<<
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Standards of Accreditation (SOA) Offenses Data

2017-2018 Offenses
  Number of Offenses
Disorderly or Disruptive Behavior Offenses <
Other Offenses Against Persons <
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Short Term Suspensions

Short Term Suspensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

A short-term suspension (10 days of less) may be imposed by a principal, an assistant principal, or a designee teacher in the principal’s absence. The principal or assistant principal must tell the student of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his version of what occurred. Notice to the parent may be oral or written, depending on local school board policy, and must include information on the length of the suspension, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired.  A parent may ask for a short-term suspension decision to be reviewed by the superintendent or his designee. Local school board policy will determine whether the superintendent’s decision is final or can be appealed to the local school board. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Short Term Suspensions
  2016-20172017-2018
Subgroup % Population% Short Term Suspensions% Population% Short Term Suspensions
American Indian0.1510.148
Asian9.3518.593
Black21.26710021.6325
Hispanic24.88727.25950
Native Hawaiian0.6030.148
White36.95335.111
Two or more races6.7877.11125
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Long Term Suspensions

Long Term Supensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

A long-term suspension (more than 10 school days and less than 365 calendar days)  is usually imposed by a disciplinary hearing officer upon recommendation of a principal. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred. Notice to the parent (and child) must be in writing and must include information on the length of and reason for the suspension, the right to a hearing in accordance with local school board policy, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired or to attend an appropriate alternative education program approved by the school board during the suspension or after the suspension period expires. Costs for any community-based educational programs or alternative programs that are not part of the program offered by the school division are the financial responsibility of the parent. A parent has the right to appeal a long-term suspension decision in accordance with local school board policy. The appeal may first go to the local superintendent or his or her designee or to a sub-committee of the local school board; final appeal is to the full school board. The appeal must be decided by the school board within 30 days. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Long Term Suspensions
  2016-20172017-2018
Subgroup % Population% Long Term Suspensions% Population% Long Term Suspensions
American Indian0.1510.148
Asian9.3518.593
Black21.26721.63
Hispanic24.88727.259
Native Hawaiian0.6030.148
White36.95335.111
Two or more races6.7877.111
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Expulsions

Expulsions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

An expulsion (removal from school for 365 calendar days) may only be imposed by a local school board. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred.  The parent (and child) must be noticed in writing of the proposed expulsion, the reasons the expulsion is being proposed, and of the right to a hearing before the school board or a sub-committee of the school board, depending on local policy. If the student is expelled, the parent is sent a written notification of the length of the expulsion and information on the availability of community-based educational, training, and intervention programs. The notice must state whether the student is eligible to return to regular school or to attend an approved alternative education program or an adult education program offered during or after the period of expulsion. The student may apply for readmission to be effective one calendar year from the date of his or her expulsion. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Expulsions
  2016-20172017-2018
Subgroup % Population% Expulsions% Population% Expulsions
American Indian0.1510.148
Asian9.3518.593
Black21.26721.63
Hispanic24.88727.259
Native Hawaiian0.6030.148
White36.95335.111
Two or more races6.7877.111
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility:

School divisions that choose to take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated commodities from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal they serve. In return, they must serve lunches that meet Federal requirements, and they must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children. The School Breakfast Program operates by supporting breakfasts in the same manner as the National School Lunch Program.

 

At the beginning of each school year, letters and meal applications are distributed to households of children attending school. This letter informs households that school nutrition programs are available and that free and reduced-price meals are available based on income criteria. Applications have been eliminated totally in divisions that implement the community eligibility provision for all schools within the division.

Children from families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the poverty level are eligible for free meals. Those between 130 percent and 185 percent of the poverty level are eligible for reduced-price meals, for which students can be charged no more than 40 cents for lunch and 30 cents for breakfast. All other students pay the full price for meals.

See the Virginia Department of Education website for more information about school nutrition programs.

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 30.4930.6433.33
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students :

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Breakfast Program. The School Breakfast Program is a federally assisted meal program that provides nutritious breakfast meals to students. The Virginia Department of Education administers the program at the state level and school divisions administer the program at the local level.

Participation in the School Breakfast Program has been linked increased achievement, reduced absenteeism and tardiness, fewer disciplinary problems, and better student health.

Breakfast menus must provide one-fourth of the daily recommended levels for protein, calcium, iron, Vitamin A, Vitamin C and calories. Participating schools must serve breakfasts that meet Federal nutrition standards – one quarter of daily recommended levels of protein, calcium, iron, vitamins A and C and calories – and must provide free and reduced-price breakfasts to eligible children.

The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.

 

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 32.1233.3334.38
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students:

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Lunch Program.

School divisions that take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated food items from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal served. In return, schools must serve lunches that meet federal requirements, and must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children.

Studies show that well-nourished students are better learners. The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.

 

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 81.3583.5880.36
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality
Teachers Not Properly Licensed or Endorsed​ Provisionally Licensed Teachers​ Inexperienced Teachers​
Title I Not Title I Title I Not Title I Title I Not Title I
School
This School - 2.1% - 14.9% - 6.4%
Division
All Schools 1.5% 4% 10.2% 8.4% 8.5% 4.3%
High Poverty 1.4% 7.8% 9.8% 13.8% 8.6% 7.1%
Low Poverty - 3% - 6.3% - 3.4%
State
All Schools 1.6% 2.6% 7.1% 7% 6.4% 4.5%
High Poverty 2% 5.1% 8% 11.5% 7.4% 7.6%
Low Poverty 1.1% 1.6% 2.8% 5.7% 4.2% 3.6%
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
This table reports the percentages of teachers at the school, division and state levels who are not properly licensed or endorsed for the content they are teaching, who are provisionally licensed, or who are inexperienced (less than one year of classroom experience). Percentages are reported for Title I schools, non-Title I schools, all schools and for high-poverty and low-poverty schools.

Provisionally Licensed Teachers

Provisionally Licensed Teachers
  2016-20172017-2018
Provisional Special Education2%4%
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

This table reports the percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials.

This table provides data on the percentage of classes not taught by teachers meeting the federal definition of highly qualified.

Federal education law defines a highly qualified teacher as a teacher who is fully licensed by the state, has at least a bachelor’s degree, has demonstrated competency in each subject taught, and is teaching in his or her area of endorsement.

Virginia’s licensure regulations – which emphasize content knowledge as well as pedagogy – require new teachers to far exceed the federal highly qualified standard.

Teacher Educational Attainment

Teacher Educational Attainment: 2017-2018

The Virginia Department of Education reports annually on the percentage of teachers with bachelor’s, master’s, or doctorate degrees in schools, school divisions, and the state by highest degree earned.

Teacher Educational Attainment
  Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Doctoral Degree Other
2015-201626%70%4%0%
2016-201730%68%2%0%
2017-201831%67%2%0%
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

Every Student Succeeds Act

ESSA Status: Not Identified for Support and Improvement
Accreditation Status: Accredited

ESSA School Quality Indicators Summary
Student GroupEnglish Reading PerformanceMathematics PerformanceEnglish Learner ProgressChronic AbsenteeismFederal Graduation Indicator
All StudentsYesYes-Yes-
AsianYesYes-Yes-
BlackYesYes-Yes-
HispanicYesYes-No-
WhiteYesYes-Yes-
Economically DisadvantagedYesYes-No-
English LearnersYesYesYesNo-
Students with DisabilitiesYesYes-No-

Yes = Annual target met
No = Annual target not met
TS = Too few students to evaluate
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 (ESSA) requires states to set annual and long-term targets for raising the achievement of all students. Virginia schools are focused on the following school quality indicators in meeting the objectives of the federal law:
  • Reading performance — percentage of students in the school passing state tests in reading
  • Mathematics performance — percentage of students in the school passing state tests in mathematics
  • Growth in reading and mathematics — percentage of students in the school either passing state tests in reading and mathematics or making significant progress toward passing
  • English learner progress — percentage of English learners making progress toward English-language proficiency
  • Chronic absenteeism — percentage of students missing 10 percent or more of the school year, regardless of reason (students receiving homebound and home-based instruction excluded)
  • Federal Graduation Indicator — percentage of students graduating within four years of entering the ninth grade with a Standard Diploma or Advanced Studies Diploma
More information about ESSA implementation in Virginia is available on the Virginia Department of Education website. Detailed state assessment results — including results by test type and student groups — are available on VDOE’s Test Results Build-A-Table data tool.
ESSA Annual Targets and Long-Term Goals: Reading
Student GroupCurrent RateThree-Year RateAnnual TargetLong Term Goal
All Students79%81%73%75%
Asian89%88%87%75%
Black71%74%60%75%
Hispanic75%78%63%75%
White86%87%81%75%
Economically Disadvantaged64%71%62%75%
English Learners66%71%53%75%
Students with Disabilities51%64%39%75%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires annual testing in reading in grades 3-8 and once during high school. Virginia’s ESSA implementation plan expects that by the 2023-2024 school year, at least 75 percent of all students, and of all students in the student groups listed in this table, will be able to demonstrate grade-level proficiency by passing state reading tests. Annual targets for student groups reflect improvement upon base-line performance from the 2015-2016 school year. Student groups meeting or exceeding annual or long-term targets must improve performance as compared to the previous year. Note: Reading pass rates reported for high schools reflect the performance of a 12th-grade class of students who entered the ninth grade at the same time.
ESSA Annual Targets and Long-Term Goals: Mathematics
Student GroupCurrent RateThree-Year RateAnnual TargetLong Term Goal
All Students78%81%74%70%
Asian89%93%89%70%
Black68%70%60%70%
Hispanic77%78%64%70%
White84%88%81%70%
Economically Disadvantaged65%69%63%70%
English Learners72%75%57%70%
Students with Disabilities55%64%42%70%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires annual testing in mathematics in grades 3-8 and once during high school. Virginia’s ESSA implementation plan expects that by the 2023-2024 school year, at least 70 percent of all students, and of all students in the student groups listed in this table, will be able to demonstrate grade-level proficiency by passing state mathematics tests. Annual targets for student groups reflect improvement upon base-line performance during the 2015-2016 school year. Student groups meeting or exceeding annual or long-term targets must improve performance compared to the previous year. Note: Mathematics pass rates reported for high schools reflect the performance of a 12th-grade class of students who entered the ninth grade at the same time on one of the following state tests: Algebra I, Geometry or Algebra II.
ESSA Pass Rates: Science
Student GroupCurrent Rate
All Students85%
Asian<
Black77%
Hispanic83%
White90%
Economically Disadvantaged77%
English Learners79%
Students with Disabilities73%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires that students take state tests in science at least once during elementary school, once during middle school and once during high school. Note: Science pass rates reported for high schools reflect the performance on the state Biology test of a 12th-grade class of students who entered the ninth grade at the same time.
Growth in Reading and Mathematics
Student GroupGrowth English ReadingGrowth Mathematics
All Students80%79%
Asian89%89%
Black73%69%
Hispanic76%78%
White88%84%
Economically Disadvantaged66%67%
English Learners67%73%
Students with Disabilities57%62%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

Under the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, growth in reading and mathematics is a factor in identifying elementary and middle schools for improvement and increased state support. The percentage of students showing growth in reading and mathematics includes students passing state tests and non-passing students who are making significant progress toward passing.
Chronic Absenteeism
Student GroupCurrent RateThree-Year RateAnnual TargetLong Term Goal
All Students7%9%9%10%
Asian4%10%5%10%
Black8%7%9%10%
Hispanic10%12%9%10%
White6%7%9%10%
Economically Disadvantaged14%15%13%10%
English Learners12%16%8%10%
Students with Disabilities18%20%14%10%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

Daily attendance is critical to success in school. A student is considered chronically absent if he or she is absent for 10 percent or more of the school year, regardless of whether the absences are excused or unexcused. According to the U.S. Department of Education:
  • Children who are chronically absent in preschool, kindergarten, and first grade are much less likely to read on grade level by the third grade.
  • Students who can't read at grade level by the third grade are four times more likely to drop out of high school.
  • By high school, regular attendance is a better dropout indicator than test scores.
  • A student who is chronically absent in any year between the eighth and twelfth grade is seven times more likely to drop out of school.
The calculation for chronic absenteeism only includes students enrolled for at least half of the school year. The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires states to set annual and long-term targets for reducing chronic absenteeism. Virginia’s ESSA implementation plan expects that by the 2023-2024 school year, no more than 10 percent of all students, and of students in the student groups listed in this table, will be chronically absent. Annual targets for student groups reflect improvement upon base-line data from the 2015-2016 school year. Student groups meeting or exceeding annual or long-term targets for reducing chronic absenteeism must improve performance compared to the previous year.
English Learner Progress and Proficiency
English LearnersPercentAnnual TargetLong Term Goal
English Learner Progress73%46%58%
English Learner Proficiency22%--
< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students
The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires states to set annual targets and long-term goals for increasing the percentage of English learners making progress toward attaining English-language proficiency. Virginia also reports on the percentage of English learners who attain proficiency.
English LearnersNumeratorDenominatorRate
English Learner Progress496773%
English Learner Proficiency198722%
ESSA Participation Rates
Student GroupEnglish Reading ParticipationMathematics ParticipationScience Participation
All Students100%100%100%
Asian100%100%<
Black100%100%100%
Hispanic100%100%100%
White100%100%100%
Economically Disadvantaged100%100%100%
Not Economically Disadvantaged100%100%100%
English Learners100%100%100%
Students with Disabilities100%100%100%
Students without Disabilities100%100%100%
Female100%100%100%
Male100%100%100%
Migrant---

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires states to assess at least 95 percent of students in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8, and to test at least 95 percent of students in reading and mathematics at least once during their high school careers. States also report on the percentage of students assessed in science in elementary school, middle school and in high school (Biology).
Antietam Elementary to top