Skip to Content
Agencies | Governor (opens new window)
Search Virginia.Gov (opens new window)
Menu

Cameron Elementary

General school information

Category: Elementary (PK-06) School
Phone: 703-329-2100
Address: 3434 Campbell Dr Alexandria, VA 22303
Principal: Mr. Timothy H Slayter
Superintendent: Dr. Scott S. Brabrand
School Number: 620
Region: 4
Division: Fairfax County Public Schools
Division Number: 29
Division Website (opens new window)

Map results may not reflect school division or attendance zone boundaries.

Accreditation

Assessments

Assessments

Enrollment

Enrollment

Finance

School Finance

Learning Climate

Learning Climate

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality

ESSA

Every Student Succeeds Act

School Readiness

School Readiness

ACCREDITATION

2018 Accreditation Status: Accredited
(School accreditation ratings for 2019 will be released in September.)

School Quality Indicators

Academic Achievement

English Level One
Mathematics Level One
Science Level One

Achievement Gaps

EnglishLevel One
MathematicsLevel One

Student engagement & Outcomes

Chronic Absenteeism Level One
  • Accredited: All indicators at Level One or Level Two or Waiver
  • Accredited With Conditions: One or more indicators at Level Three
  • Accreditation Denied: Under State Sanction

Achievement Gaps: English and Mathematics

Reporting on the achievement and progress of student groups allows schools to identify learners in need of additional support and resources.

Student Group Achievement Gap - English Achievement Gap - Math
Asian Level One Level One
Black Level One Level One
Economically Disadvantaged Level One Level One
English Learners Level One Level One
Hispanic Level One Level One
Students with Disabilities Level One Level One
White Level One Level One

18.28% of the students in this school were chronically absent.

Assessments

Student Achievement by Proficiency Level

Reading Performance: All Students

This chart displays the percentage of students passing state reading tests. Virginia students are assessed annually in reading in grades 3-8 and once in high school with an end-of-course (EOC) reading test. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view results for a specific test. Use the menu below the chart to select results for a specific group of students. Practice test items representative of the content and skills included in current Standards of Learning assessments are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.
overall Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 21 48 69 31 9 56 65 35 7 52 59 41
Female 23 48 71 29 10 58 68 32 9 58 67 33
Male 19 48 67 33 7 53 60 40 4 46 49 51
American Indian < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Asian 37 40 77 23 9 49 58 42 5 54 59 41
Black 20 49 69 31 8 57 65 35 2 57 59 41
Hispanic 18 44 62 38 6 54 60 40 8 49 57 43
White 27 62 88 12 14 53 67 33 9 48 57 43
Two or more races 8 77 85 15 20 80 100 0 < < 100 0
Students with Disabilities 19 29 48 52 2 44 46 54 - 30 30 70
Students without Disabilities 22 52 73 27 10 58 69 31 8 55 63 37
Economically Disadvantaged 21 44 65 35 5 55 60 40 5 49 54 46
Not Economically Disadvantaged 22 56 78 22 16 58 74 26 12 60 72 28
English Learners 20 44 64 36 - 39 39 61 2 32 33 67
Military Connected - 80 80 20 38 38 75 25
Grade 3 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 21 52 73 27 3 51 54 46 5 44 48 52
Female 14 64 78 22 3 45 48 52 6 53 58 42
Male 29 39 68 32 3 56 59 41 3 33 37 63
Asian < < < < - 50 50 50 < < < <
Black < < < < - 45 45 55 - 38 38 62
Hispanic 21 41 62 38 - 48 48 52 7 36 43 57
White < < < < 8 58 67 33 6 56 63 38
Students with Disabilities < < < < < < < < - 27 27 73
Students without Disabilities 21 55 76 24 4 54 57 43 5 47 53 47
Economically Disadvantaged 23 47 70 30 - 45 45 55 4 39 43 57
Not Economically Disadvantaged 17 63 79 21 10 62 71 29 5 55 60 40
English Learners 25 43 68 33 - 45 45 55 2 34 37 63
Military Connected < < < < < < < <
Grade 4 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 15 38 52 48 8 60 68 32 4 52 57 43
Female 19 41 59 41 6 69 74 26 6 54 60 40
Male 8 33 42 58 10 50 60 40 3 50 53 47
Asian < < < < < < < < 11 63 74 26
Black - 33 33 67 < < < < 8 46 54 46
Hispanic 14 42 56 44 6 51 57 43 - 42 42 58
White < < 100 0 - 80 80 20 - 50 50 50
Two or more races < < < < < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Students with Disabilities 27 18 45 55 < < < < < < < <
Students without Disabilities 12 42 54 46 9 63 71 29 5 57 62 38
Economically Disadvantaged 12 39 51 49 9 59 68 32 4 46 50 50
Not Economically Disadvantaged 20 35 55 45 5 62 67 33 6 71 76 24
English Learners 12 38 50 50 - 38 38 62 3 42 44 56
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < < <
Grade 5 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 18 45 63 37 7 53 60 40 11 56 67 33
Female 21 41 62 38 12 59 71 29 16 59 76 24
Male 16 50 66 34 - 43 43 57 4 50 54 46
Asian 20 60 80 20 < < < < < < < <
Black 25 58 83 17 < < < < < < < <
Hispanic 19 31 50 50 3 63 66 34 10 48 58 42
White < < < < < < < < 27 45 73 27
Two or more races < < < < < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Students with Disabilities 8 25 33 67 - 42 42 58 < < < <
Students without Disabilities 20 49 69 31 9 56 64 36 12 58 70 30
Economically Disadvantaged 17 36 52 48 2 54 56 44 5 58 63 37
Not Economically Disadvantaged 21 59 79 21 19 50 69 31 28 50 78 22
English Learners 13 46 59 41 - 35 35 65 - 16 16 84
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < < <
Grade 6 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 31 56 87 13 16 59 75 25 7 58 65 35
Female 39 47 87 13 19 59 78 22 10 65 74 26
Male 20 67 87 13 14 58 72 28 4 50 54 46
American Indian < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Asian < < < < 27 55 82 18 < < < <
Black 44 44 88 13 < < < < - 64 64 36
Hispanic 20 63 83 17 14 53 67 33 13 66 78 22
White < < 100 0 < < < < < < < <
Students with Disabilities 20 40 60 40 6 50 56 44 - 50 50 50
Students without Disabilities 33 59 91 9 20 62 82 18 9 60 68 32
Economically Disadvantaged 30 52 83 17 9 60 70 30 7 56 62 38
Not Economically Disadvantaged 32 64 95 5 27 57 83 17 8 67 75 25
English Learners 31 51 83 17 - 35 35 65 - 22 22 78
Military Connected < < < < < < 100 0
Grade 7 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Grade 8 English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
EOC English Reading Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Writing Performance: All Students

This chart displays the percentage of students passing state writing tests. Virginia students are assessed in writing in grade 8 and once in most high schools with a state end-of-course (EOC) writing test. If a high school administers a locally developed writing assessment, results are not included in this chart as scores on locally developed writing assessments are not reported to the Virginia Department of Education. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view results for a specific test. Use the menu below the chart to select results for a specific group of students. Practice test items representative of the content and skills included in current Standards of Learning assessments are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.
overall Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Grade 8 Writing Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
EOC Writing Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Math Performance: All Students

This chart displays the percentage of students passing state mathematics tests. Virginia students are assessed annually in mathematics in grades 3-8 and at the end of secondary courses (Algebra I, Geometry and Algebra II) as needed to meet graduation requirements. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view results for a specific test. Use the menu below the chart to select results for a specific group of students. Practice test items representative of the content and skills included in current Standards of Learning assessments are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.
overall Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 16 52 69 31 12 57 68 32 7 67 74 26
Female 19 48 67 33 9 59 68 32 10 68 78 22
Male 13 58 70 30 14 54 68 32 4 65 68 32
American Indian < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Asian 24 50 74 26 19 51 70 30 11 70 81 19
Black 27 49 76 24 11 57 68 32 2 72 74 26
Hispanic 12 49 60 40 8 57 65 35 4 64 69 31
White 14 75 89 11 14 53 67 33 15 62 77 23
Two or more races 15 62 77 23 20 60 80 20 < < < <
Students with Disabilities 5 26 31 69 6 34 40 60 3 33 36 64
Students without Disabilities 18 57 76 24 13 62 74 26 8 71 79 21
Economically Disadvantaged 12 53 65 35 8 59 66 34 5 64 69 31
Not Economically Disadvantaged 23 52 76 24 19 52 72 28 13 73 87 13
English Learners 12 51 63 37 4 46 50 50 4 53 57 43
Military Connected 30 50 80 20 13 69 81 19
Grade 3 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 10 54 65 35 6 49 55 45 9 59 68 32
Female 11 54 65 35 6 48 55 45 11 59 70 30
Male 10 55 65 35 6 50 56 44 7 59 66 34
Asian < < < < 11 44 56 44 < < 100 0
Black < < < < - 45 45 55 - 69 69 31
Hispanic 3 49 51 49 - 52 52 48 - 50 50 50
White 20 70 90 10 17 50 67 33 24 59 82 18
Students with Disabilities < < < < < < < < 9 - 9 91
Students without Disabilities 12 59 71 29 7 53 60 40 9 71 80 20
Economically Disadvantaged 2 57 59 41 5 48 52 48 7 54 61 39
Not Economically Disadvantaged 25 50 75 25 10 52 62 38 15 70 85 15
English Learners 8 50 58 43 5 43 48 53 10 49 59 41
Military Connected < < < < < < 100 0
Grade 4 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 13 44 57 43 15 46 62 38 6 52 58 42
Female 15 41 56 44 11 57 69 31 6 54 60 40
Male 8 50 58 42 20 33 53 47 6 50 56 44
Asian < < < < < < < < 11 61 72 28
Black 8 50 58 42 < < < < 8 38 46 54
Hispanic 14 38 51 49 17 37 54 46 - 50 50 50
White < < < < - 70 70 30 - 64 64 36
Two or more races < < < < < < 100 0 < < < <
Students with Disabilities - 9 9 91 < < < < < < < <
Students without Disabilities 15 52 67 33 16 50 66 34 7 57 64 36
Economically Disadvantaged 9 44 53 47 14 48 61 39 6 48 54 46
Not Economically Disadvantaged 20 45 65 35 19 43 62 38 6 65 71 29
English Learners 9 45 55 45 4 35 38 62 3 47 50 50
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < < <
Grade 5 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 20 38 58 42 - 51 51 49 3 74 77 23
Female 20 31 51 49 - 50 50 50 5 81 86 14
Male 21 45 66 34 - 53 53 47 - 67 67 33
Asian 20 40 60 40 < < < < < < < <
Black 50 30 80 20 < < < < < < 100 0
Hispanic 16 31 47 53 - 52 52 48 5 65 70 30
White < < < < < < < < < < < <
Two or more races < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
Students with Disabilities - 10 10 90 - 18 18 82 < < < <
Students without Disabilities 24 43 67 33 - 64 64 36 3 77 80 20
Economically Disadvantaged 17 34 51 49 - 52 52 48 4 68 71 29
Not Economically Disadvantaged 26 43 70 30 < < < < - 91 91 9
English Learners 16 39 55 45 - 45 45 55 - 58 58 42
Military Connected < < < < < < < <
Grade 6 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 19 71 90 10 15 72 87 13 10 79 89 11
Female 26 66 92 8 12 71 83 17 16 78 95 5
Male 10 77 87 13 19 72 92 8 - 81 81 19
American Indian < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Asian < < < < 31 62 92 8 < < < <
Black 31 63 94 6 < < 100 0 - 92 92 8
Hispanic 16 71 87 13 5 78 83 17 9 81 91 9
White < < 100 0 < < < < 30 50 80 20
Two or more races < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Students with Disabilities 9 64 73 27 - 59 59 41 < < < <
Students without Disabilities 21 72 93 7 20 75 95 5 11 80 91 9
Economically Disadvantaged 15 76 91 9 9 81 89 11 4 82 86 14
Not Economically Disadvantaged 26 61 87 13 26 58 84 16 29 71 100 0
English Learners 12 76 88 12 4 67 71 29 - 68 68 32
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Grade 7 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students < < 100 0 31 69 100 0 6 88 94 6
Female < < 100 0 < < 100 0 10 80 90 10
Male < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Asian < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Black < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Hispanic < < 100 0 < < 100 0 9 82 91 9
White < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Students with Disabilities < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Students without Disabilities < < 100 0 18 82 100 0 6 88 94 6
Economically Disadvantaged < < 100 0 < < 100 0 - 92 92 8
Not Economically Disadvantaged < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Grade 8 Mathematics Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Algebra I Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Geometry Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Algebra II Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Science Performance: All Students

This chart displays the percentage of students passing state science tests. Virginia students are assessed in science in grades 5 and 8 and at the end of secondary courses (Earth Science, Biology and Chemistry) as needed to meet graduation requirements. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view results for a specific test. Use the menu below the chart to select results for a specific group of students. Practice test items representative of the content and skills included in current Standards of Learning assessments are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.
overall Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 18 49 67 33 2 68 70 30 11 67 79 21
Female 15 54 69 31 3 71 74 26 14 73 86 14
Male 21 42 64 36 - 65 65 35 8 58 67 33
Asian 30 40 70 30 < < < < < < < <
Black 33 42 75 25 < < < < < < 100 0
Hispanic 11 47 58 42 3 72 75 25 6 65 71 29
White < < 100 0 < < < < 9 73 82 18
Two or more races < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
Students with Disabilities 8 17 25 75 - 50 50 50 < < < <
Students without Disabilities 20 55 75 25 2 73 76 24 12 68 81 19
Economically Disadvantaged 12 49 60 40 - 63 63 37 7 67 74 26
Not Economically Disadvantaged 28 48 76 24 6 81 88 13 22 67 89 11
English Learners 9 54 63 37 - 48 48 52 - 37 37 63
Military Connected < < < < < < < <
Grade 5 Science Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 18 49 67 33 2 68 70 30 11 67 79 21
Female 15 54 69 31 3 71 74 26 14 73 86 14
Male 21 42 64 36 - 65 65 35 8 58 67 33
Asian 30 40 70 30 < < < < < < < <
Black 33 42 75 25 < < < < < < 100 0
Hispanic 11 47 58 42 3 72 75 25 6 65 71 29
White < < 100 0 < < < < 9 73 82 18
Two or more races < < < < < < < < < < 100 0
Students with Disabilities 8 17 25 75 - 50 50 50 < < < <
Students without Disabilities 20 55 75 25 2 73 76 24 12 68 81 19
Economically Disadvantaged 12 49 60 40 - 63 63 37 7 67 74 26
Not Economically Disadvantaged 28 48 76 24 6 81 88 13 22 67 89 11
English Learners 9 54 63 37 - 48 48 52 - 37 37 63
Military Connected < < < < < < < <
Grade 8 Science Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Biology Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Chemistry Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Earth Science Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

History Performance: All Students

This chart displays the percentage of students passing state tests in history/social science. Virginia students are assessed in history/social science once in elementary school (Virginia Studies), once in middle school (Civics and Economics) and at the end of secondary courses (Geography, World History I, World History II and Virginia and United States History) as needed to meet graduation requirements. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view results for a specific test. Use the menu below the chart to select results for a specific group of students. Practice test items representative of the content and skills included in current Standards of Learning assessments are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.
overall Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 13 39 52 48 22 51 72 28 4 49 54 46
Female 14 43 57 43 17 63 80 20 - 54 54 46
Male 13 33 46 54 27 37 63 37 9 44 53 47
Asian < < < < < < < < 11 50 61 39
Black 17 17 33 67 < < < < - 38 38 62
Hispanic 11 46 57 43 23 37 60 40 - 50 50 50
White < < < < < < 100 0 9 45 55 45
Two or more races < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Students with Disabilities - 20 20 80 10 30 40 60 < < < <
Students without Disabilities 16 43 59 41 24 55 78 22 5 54 59 41
Economically Disadvantaged 12 41 54 46 18 49 67 33 4 40 44 56
Not Economically Disadvantaged 15 35 50 50 30 55 85 15 6 76 82 18
English Learners 10 43 52 48 - 46 46 54 - 39 39 61
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < < <
VA Studies Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
All Students 13 39 52 48 22 51 72 28 4 49 54 46
Female 14 43 57 43 17 63 80 20 - 54 54 46
Male 13 33 46 54 27 37 63 37 9 44 53 47
Asian < < < < < < < < 11 50 61 39
Black 17 17 33 67 < < < < - 38 38 62
Hispanic 11 46 57 43 23 37 60 40 - 50 50 50
White < < < < < < 100 0 9 45 55 45
Two or more races < < 100 0 < < 100 0 < < 100 0
Students with Disabilities - 20 20 80 10 30 40 60 < < < <
Students without Disabilities 16 43 59 41 24 55 78 22 5 54 59 41
Economically Disadvantaged 12 41 54 46 18 49 67 33 4 40 44 56
Not Economically Disadvantaged 15 35 50 50 30 55 85 15 6 76 82 18
English Learners 10 43 52 48 - 46 46 54 - 39 39 61
Military Connected < < 100 0 < < < <
VA & US History Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
World History I Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
World History II Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Civics & Econ Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
Geography Performance 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Student Subgroup Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed Advanced Proficient Passed Failed
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Number of Recently Arrived English Language Learners Exempted From State Reading Assessments

2016-20172017-20182018-2019
School1438
Division1,2568501,072
State4,2272,7623,719
Number of Recently Arrived English Language Learners Exempted From State Reading Assessments

Virginia Alternate Assessment Program Participation Rates

Reading
Subject Area Number of Students Taking VAAP Tests Total Number of Students Percent of Students Taking VAAP Tests
Number and percentage of students participating in the Virginia Alternate Assessment Program.

Enrollment

Fall Membership by Grade

Grade 2016-20172017-20182018-2019
Pre-kindergarten363737
Kindergarten717775
Grade 1698273
Grade 2767086
Grade 3706471
Grade 4666475
Grade 5745861
Grade 6687157
Total Students530523535

< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Fall Membership by Subgroups

2018 Fall Membership By Subgroup: Racial and Ethnic Groups

The Virginia Department of Education annually collects statistics on the number of students enrolled in public schools on September 30.  Student counts are reported by grade assignment, race, ethnicity, disability, English proficiency, and economic status. The collection of race and ethnicity information as specified by the U.S. Department of Education is required for eligibility for federal education funds and for accountability reports. A student is reported as economically disadvantaged if he or she meets any one of the following criteria:
  • Is eligible for Free/Reduced Meals;
  • Receives Temporary Assistance for Needy Families;
  • Is eligible for Medicaid; or
  • Is a migrant or is experiencing homelessness.
.
Fall Membership by Subgroup
Subgroup 2016-20172017-20182018-2019
All Students530523535
Female288276290
Male242247245
American Indian143
Asian768288
Black946577
Hispanic252235217
Native Hawaiian432
White75107126
Two or more races282722
Students with Disabilities586056
Students without Disabilities472463479
Economically Disadvantaged207331367
Not Economically Disadvantaged323192168
English Learners295313312
Not English Learners235210223
Homeless2105
Military Connected81925
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

School Finance

Percentage of Expenditures

Division Expenditures

Statewide Expenditures

Sources of Financial Support and Total Per Pupil Expenditures for Operations

Division Per-Pupil Spending

Statewide Per-Pupil Spending

School divisions report annually on expenditures and appropriations to meet each locality’s required local effort in support of the Standards of Quality and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. The amount by which school divisions exceed these required minimums varies based on local decisions and circumstances. Most state support for public education is equalized to reflect each division’s capacity to support the required educational program. The Composite Index of Local Ability-to-Pay determines state and local shares of Standards of Quality costs for each division and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. A portion of state sales tax revenues is distributed in support of public education based on school-age population estimates. The federal government provides assistance to state and local education agencies in support of specific federal initiatives and mandates, such as instructional services for economically disadvantaged students and students with disabilities.
School Division - Per-Pupil Spending
  Type Local Funding State Federal
2012-2013Division10,360.003,137.00611.00
State5,761.004,621.00875.00
2013-2014Division10,388.003,139.00606.00
State5,807.004,651.00784.00
2014-2015Division10,413.003,227.00579.00
State5,933.004,819.00771.00
2015-2016Division10,526.003,267.00606.00
State6,084.004,849.00812.00
2016-2017Division10,883.003,364.00649.00
State6,248.005,052.00871.00

Learning Climate

Chronic Absenteeism

Chronic Absenteeism 2018-2019 School Year:

Daily attendance is critical to success in school. A student is considered chronically absent if he or she misses two or more instructional days per month (18 days, or 10 percent of a 180-day school year) regardless of whether the absences are excused or unexcused. According to the U.S. Department of Education:
  • Children who are chronically absent in preschool, kindergarten, and first grade are much less likely to read on grade level by the third grade.
  • Students who can't read at grade level by the third grade are four times more likely to drop out of high school.
  • By high school, regular attendance is a better dropout indicator than test scores.
  • A student who is chronically absent in any year between the eighth and twelfth grade is seven times more likely to drop out of school.
Absenteeism by Subgroup
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Subgroup Below 10% 10% or Above Below 10% 10% or Above Below 10% 10% or Above
All Students455434563446231
Female24715247182479
Male208282091621522
American Indian<<<<<<
Asian6477267111
Black798563695
Hispanic223172061519610
Native Hawaiian<<<<--
White61119351035
Two or more races230234210
Students with Disabilities537654535
Economically Disadvantaged295313012732625
English Learners279252952428918
Homeless<<101<<
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Standards of Accreditation (SOA) Offenses Data

2017-2018 Offenses
  Number of Offenses
Disorderly or Disruptive Behavior Offenses <
Other Offenses Against Persons <
Offenses Against Student <

< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Short-Term Suspensions

Short-Term Suspensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time. A short-term suspension (10 days of less) may be imposed by a principal, an assistant principal, or a designee teacher in the principal’s absence. The principal or assistant principal must tell the student of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his version of what occurred. Notice to the parent may be oral or written, depending on local school board policy, and must include information on the length of the suspension, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired.  A parent may ask for a short-term suspension decision to be reviewed by the superintendent or his designee. Local school board policy will determine whether the superintendent’s decision is final or can be appealed to the local school board. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.
Short-Term Suspensions
  2016-20172017-2018
Subgroup % Population% Short-Term Suspensions% Population% Short-Term Suspensions
American Indian0.20.8
Asian14.315.7
Black17.766.712.4
Hispanic47.533.344.933.3
Native Hawaiian0.80.6
White14.220.5
Two or more races5.35.266.7
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Long-Term Suspensions

Long-Term Supensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time. A long-term suspension (more than 10 school days and less than 365 calendar days)  is usually imposed by a disciplinary hearing officer upon recommendation of a principal. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred. Notice to the parent (and child) must be in writing and must include information on the length of and reason for the suspension, the right to a hearing in accordance with local school board policy, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired or to attend an appropriate alternative education program approved by the school board during the suspension or after the suspension period expires. Costs for any community-based educational programs or alternative programs that are not part of the program offered by the school division are the financial responsibility of the parent. A parent has the right to appeal a long-term suspension decision in accordance with local school board policy. The appeal may first go to the local superintendent or his or her designee or to a sub-committee of the local school board; final appeal is to the full school board. The appeal must be decided by the school board within 30 days. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.
Long-Term Suspensions
  2016-20172017-2018
Subgroup % Population% Long-Term Suspensions% Population% Long-Term Suspensions
American Indian0.20.8
Asian14.315.7
Black17.712.4
Hispanic47.544.9
Native Hawaiian0.80.6
White14.220.5
Two or more races5.35.2
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Expulsions

Expulsions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time. An expulsion (removal from school for 365 calendar days) may only be imposed by a local school board. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred.  The parent (and child) must be noticed in writing of the proposed expulsion, the reasons the expulsion is being proposed, and of the right to a hearing before the school board or a sub-committee of the school board, depending on local policy. If the student is expelled, the parent is sent a written notification of the length of the expulsion and information on the availability of community-based educational, training, and intervention programs. The notice must state whether the student is eligible to return to regular school or to attend an approved alternative education program or an adult education program offered during or after the period of expulsion. The student may apply for readmission to be effective one calendar year from the date of his or her expulsion. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.
Expulsions
  2016-20172017-2018
Subgroup % Population% Expulsions% Population% Expulsions
American Indian0.20.8
Asian14.315.7
Black17.712.4
Hispanic47.544.9
Native Hawaiian0.80.6
White14.220.5
Two or more races5.35.2
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility:

School divisions that choose to take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated commodities from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal they serve. In return, they must serve lunches that meet Federal requirements, and they must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children. The School Breakfast Program operates by supporting breakfasts in the same manner as the National School Lunch Program.   At the beginning of each school year, letters and meal applications are distributed to households of children attending school. This letter informs households that school nutrition programs are available and that free and reduced-price meals are available based on income criteria. Applications have been eliminated totally in divisions that implement the community eligibility provision for all schools within the division. Children from families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the poverty level are eligible for free meals. Those between 130 percent and 185 percent of the poverty level are eligible for reduced-price meals, for which students can be charged no more than 40 cents for lunch and 30 cents for breakfast. All other students pay the full price for meals. See the Virginia Department of Education website for more information about school nutrition programs.
Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility
  2016-20172017-20182018-2019
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 57.262.566.3
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students :

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Breakfast Program. The School Breakfast Program is a federally assisted meal program that provides nutritious breakfast meals to students. The Virginia Department of Education administers the program at the state level and school divisions administer the program at the local level. Participation in the School Breakfast Program has been linked increased achievement, reduced absenteeism and tardiness, fewer disciplinary problems, and better student health. Breakfast menus must provide one-fourth of the daily recommended levels for protein, calcium, iron, Vitamin A, Vitamin C and calories. Participating schools must serve breakfasts that meet Federal nutrition standards – one quarter of daily recommended levels of protein, calcium, iron, vitamins A and C and calories – and must provide free and reduced-price breakfasts to eligible children. The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.  
Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation
  2016-20172017-20182018-2019
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 49.765.965.7
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students:

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Lunch Program. School divisions that take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated food items from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal served. In return, schools must serve lunches that meet federal requirements, and must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children. Studies show that well-nourished students are better learners. The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.  
Free and Reduced Lunch Participation
  2016-20172017-20182018-2019
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 82.176.779.7
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Civil Rights Data Collection

The Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) is a survey of all public schools and school districts in the United States. The CRDC includes data on student access to courses, programs, staff, and resources relevant to educational equity and opportunity for students.​

The U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights reports information collected through the CRDC in carrying out its mission “to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence throughout the nation through vigorous enforcement of civil rights.”​

More information about the Civil Rights Data Collection is available on the Virginia Department of Education website.

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality

Teachers Not Fully Licensed or Endorsed​ Provisionally Licensed Teachers​ Inexperienced Teachers​
Title I Not Title I Title I Not Title I Title I Not Title I
School
This School - - 12.2% - 12.2% -
Division
All Schools 1.9% 3.2% 7.4% 8% 4.8% 4.3%
High Poverty 1.5% 8.6% 7.1% 10.3% 4.9% 5.2%
Low Poverty - 2.3% - 7.7% - 4.5%
State
All Schools 1.6% 2.6% 7.1% 7% 6.4% 4.5%
High Poverty 2% 5.1% 8% 11.5% 7.4% 7.6%
Low Poverty 1.1% 1.6% 2.8% 5.7% 4.2% 3.6%

< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

This table reports the percentages of teachers at the school, division and state levels who are not properly licensed or endorsed for the content they are teaching, who are provisionally licensed, or who are inexperienced (less than one year of classroom experience). Percentages are reported for Title I schools, non-Title I schools, all schools and for high-poverty and low-poverty schools.

Provisionally Licensed Teachers

  2016-20172017-2018
Provisional Special Education0%0%

< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

This table reports the percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials.

Teacher Educational Attainment

Teacher Educational Attainment: 2017-2018

No additional explanation available.
Teacher Educational Attainment
  Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Doctoral Degree Other
2016-201723%77%0%0%
2017-201824%76%0%0%
< = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = Not applicable or no data for group
* = Data not yet available

Every Student Succeeds Act

2018 ESSA Status: Not Identified for Support and Improvement
2018 Accreditation Status: Accredited

ESSA School Quality Indicators Summary

Student GroupEnglish Reading PerformanceMathematics PerformanceEnglish Learner ProgressChronic AbsenteeismFederal Graduation Indicator
All StudentsNoNo-Yes-
AsianNoNo-No-
BlackYesYes-Yes-
HispanicYesYes-Yes-
WhiteNoYes-Yes-
Economically DisadvantagedYesYes-Yes-
English LearnersYesYesYesYes-
Students with DisabilitiesYesNo-Yes-

Yes = Annual target met
No = Annual target not met
TS = Too few students to evaluate
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 (ESSA) requires states to set annual and long-term targets for raising the achievement of all students. Virginia schools are focused on the following school quality indicators in meeting the objectives of the federal law:
  • Reading performance — percentage of students in the school passing state tests in reading
  • Mathematics performance — percentage of students in the school passing state tests in mathematics
  • Growth in reading and mathematics — percentage of students in the school either passing state tests in reading and mathematics or making significant progress toward passing
  • English learner progress — percentage of English learners making progress toward English-language proficiency
  • Chronic absenteeism — percentage of students missing 10 percent or more of the school year, regardless of reason (students receiving homebound and home-based instruction excluded)
  • Federal Graduation Indicator — percentage of students graduating within four years of entering the ninth grade with a Standard Diploma or Advanced Studies Diploma
More information about ESSA implementation in Virginia is available on the Virginia Department of Education website. Detailed state assessment results — including results by test type and student groups — are available on VDOE’s Test Results Build-A-Table data tool.

ESSA Annual Targets and Long-Term Goals: Reading

Student GroupCurrent RateThree-Year RateAnnual TargetLong-Term Goal
All Students66%68%73%75%
Asian63%70%87%75%
Black65%66%60%75%
Hispanic60%64%63%75%
White73%76%81%75%
Economically Disadvantaged61%63%62%75%
English Learners57%61%53%75%
Students with Disabilities46%49%39%75%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires annual testing in reading in grades 3-8 and once during high school. Virginia’s ESSA implementation plan expects that by the 2023-2024 school year, at least 75 percent of all students, and of all students in the student groups listed in this table, will be able to demonstrate grade-level proficiency by passing state reading tests. Annual targets for student groups reflect improvement upon base-line performance from the 2015-2016 school year. Student groups meeting or exceeding annual or long-term targets must improve performance as compared to the previous year. Note: Reading pass rates reported for high schools reflect the performance of a 12th-grade class of students who entered the ninth grade at the same time.

ESSA Annual Targets and Long-Term Goals: Mathematics

Student GroupCurrent RateThree-Year RateAnnual TargetLong-Term Goal
All Students70%66%74%70%
Asian71%71%89%70%
Black69%69%60%70%
Hispanic66%60%64%70%
White75%82%81%70%
Economically Disadvantaged68%63%63%70%
English Learners66%60%57%70%
Students with Disabilities41%40%42%70%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires annual testing in mathematics in grades 3-8 and once during high school. Virginia’s ESSA implementation plan expects that by the 2023-2024 school year, at least 70 percent of all students, and of all students in the student groups listed in this table, will be able to demonstrate grade-level proficiency by passing state mathematics tests. Annual targets for student groups reflect improvement upon base-line performance during the 2015-2016 school year. Student groups meeting or exceeding annual or long-term targets must improve performance compared to the previous year. Note: Mathematics pass rates reported for high schools reflect the performance of a 12th-grade class of students who entered the ninth grade at the same time on one of the following state tests: Algebra I, Geometry or Algebra II.

ESSA Pass Rates: Science

Student GroupCurrent Rate
All Students71%
Asian<
Black<
Hispanic75%
White<
Economically Disadvantaged65%
English Learners66%
Students with Disabilities50%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires that students take state tests in science at least once during elementary school, once during middle school and once during high school. Note: Science pass rates reported for high schools reflect the performance on the state Biology test of a 12th-grade class of students who entered the ninth grade at the same time.

Growth in Reading and Mathematics

Student GroupGrowth English ReadingGrowth Mathematics
All Students72%75%
Asian65%79%
Black68%75%
Hispanic71%72%
White76%78%
Economically Disadvantaged69%72%
English Learners65%73%
Students with Disabilities63%53%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

Under the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, growth in reading and mathematics is a factor in identifying elementary and middle schools for improvement and increased state support. The percentage of students showing growth in reading and mathematics includes students passing state tests and non-passing students who are making significant progress toward passing.

Chronic Absenteeism

Student GroupCurrent RateThree-Year RateAnnual TargetLong-Term Goal
All Students7%7%9%10%
Asian8%9%5%10%
Black5%8%9%10%
Hispanic7%6%9%10%
White5%9%9%10%
Economically Disadvantaged8%8%13%10%
English Learners8%8%8%10%
Students with Disabilities6%9%14%10%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires states to set annual and long-term targets for reducing chronic absenteeism. Virginia’s ESSA implementation plan expects that by the 2023-2024 school year, no more than 10 percent of all students, and of students in the student groups listed in this table, will be chronically absent. Annual targets for student groups reflect improvement upon base-line data from the 2015-2016 school year. Student groups meeting or exceeding annual or long-term targets for reducing chronic absenteeism must improve performance compared to the previous year.

English Learner Progress and Proficiency

English LearnersPercentAnnual TargetLong-Term Goal
English Learner Progress63%46%58%
English Learner Proficiency9%--

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires states to set annual targets and long-term goals for increasing the percentage of English learners making progress toward attaining English-language proficiency. Virginia also reports on the percentage of English learners who attain proficiency.
English LearnersNumeratorDenominatorRate
English Learner Progress10516863%
English Learner Proficiency242569%

ESSA Participation Rates

Student GroupEnglish Reading ParticipationMathematics ParticipationScience Participation
All Students100%100%100%
Asian100%100%<
Black100%100%<
Hispanic100%100%100%
White100%100%<
Economically Disadvantaged100%100%100%
Not Economically Disadvantaged100%100%100%
English Learners100%100%100%
Students with Disabilities100%100%100%
Students without Disabilities100%100%100%
Female100%100%100%
Male100%100%100%
Migrant---

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires states to assess at least 95 percent of students in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8, and to test at least 95 percent of students in reading and mathematics at least once during their high school careers. States also report on the percentage of students assessed in science in elementary school, middle school and in high school (Biology).

School Readiness

Kindergarten Students' Public Preschool Experience

This chart displays the percentage of kindergarten students who were previously enrolled in a public preschool within a Virginia school division. Students who were enrolled in a public preschool program administered by a non-governmental agency — such as a Head Start program administered by a local nonprofit organization — are not included.
Percent of Kindergarten Students​​
Public Preschool​
School 28%
Division 21%
State 33%

Kindergarten Students Meeting Fall Literacy Benchmarks

This chart presents the percentage of kindergarten students scoring at or above the benchmark on the fall Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening (PALS) assessment. Note: Fairfax County Public Schools administers an alternate literacy assessment and school-level results for Fairfax County kindergarten students are not reported to the Virginia Department of Education.
Percent of Kindergarten Students Meeting Fall Literacy Benchmarks​​​
School %
Division 64%
State 81%
Cameron Elementary to top