Skip to Content
Agencies | Governor (opens new window)
Search Virginia.Gov (opens new window)

Locust Grove Elementary

General school information

Category: Elementary (03-05) School
Phone: 540-661-4440
Address: 31208 Constitution Highway Locust Grove, VA 22508
Principal: Mr. Evan Straub
Superintendent: Dr. Cecil Snead
Region: 4
Division: Orange County Public Schools
Division Website (opens new window)

Map results may not reflect school division or attendance zone boundaries.

Accreditation

Performance Snapshot

Assessments

Assessments

Enrollment

Enrollment

Finance

School Finance

Learning Climate

Learning Climate

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality

ESSA

Every Student Succeeds Act

State Accreditation Status

Accredited

Reward School Status


ACCREDITATION

Accreditation Status This Year: Accredited
Annual Waiver: 2016 through 2018

School Quality Indicators

Academic Achievement

English Level One
Mathematics Level One
Science Level One

Achievement Gaps

EnglishLevel Two
MathematicsLevel Two

Student engagement & Outcomes

Chronic Absenteeism Level One

Accredited: All indicators at Level One or Level Two or Waiver
Accredited With Conditions: One or more indicators at Level Three
Accreditation Denied: Under State Sanction

Achievement Gaps: English and Mathematics

Reporting on the achievement and progress of student groups allows schools to identify learners in need of additional support and resources.

Student Group Achievement Gap - English Achievement Gap - Math
Asian Level One Level One
Black Level One Level One
Economically Disadvantaged Level One Level One
English Learners Level One Level One
Hispanic Level One Level One
Students with Disabilities Level Three Level Three
White Level One Level One

18.28% of the students in this school were chronically absent.

Assessments

Student Achievement by Proficiency Level

Reading

Reading Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia students are assessed annually in reading in grades 3-8 and once in high school with an end-of-course reading test. Use the drop down menu above the chart to view the results for a specific reading test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s English Standards of Learning prepare students to participate in society as literate citizens, equipped with the ability to communicate effectively in their communities, in the workplace, and in postsecondary education. As students progress, they become active and involved listeners and develop a full command of the English language, evidenced by their use of standard English and their growing spoken and written vocabularies.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 28 82 54 18 25 85 60 15 26 80 54 20
Female 31 85 55 15 26 85 59 15 28 83 55 17
Male 25 78 53 22 24 86 62 14 24 76 52 24
Asian < 100 < 0 < < < < < 100 < 0
Black 11 67 56 33 14 68 54 32 21 72 51 28
Hispanic 23 86 63 14 21 89 68 11 12 73 61 27
White 29 83 54 17 25 87 62 13 29 82 53 18
Two or more races 37 80 43 20 31 86 55 14 21 79 58 21
Students with Disabilities 16 44 28 56 8 50 43 50 7 45 39 55
Students without Disabilities 29 85 56 15 27 89 62 11 28 84 56 16
Economically Disadvantaged 22 72 50 28 18 80 62 20 18 71 53 29
Not Economically Disadvantaged 30 86 56 14 28 88 60 12 30 85 54 15
English Learners 29 86 57 14 12 76 65 24 10 60 50 40
Grade 3 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 21 79 58 21 16 86 70 14 17 70 53 30
Female 23 87 64 13 17 85 68 15 16 72 56 28
Male 19 70 51 30 16 87 71 13 18 68 50 32
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black - 67 67 33 15 77 62 23 13 63 50 38
Hispanic 8 77 69 23 10 90 80 10 - 63 63 38
White 26 81 54 19 16 87 71 13 20 70 51 30
Two or more races 18 82 64 18 17 83 67 17 30 90 60 10
Students with Disabilities < < < < 6 61 56 39 7 33 27 67
Students without Disabilities 22 82 60 18 18 90 72 10 18 75 56 25
Economically Disadvantaged 17 75 58 25 12 82 71 18 11 59 48 41
Not Economically Disadvantaged 23 81 58 19 18 88 69 13 20 76 56 24
English Learners < < < < < < < < < < < <
Grade 4 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 24 79 56 21 29 86 56 14 22 83 61 17
Female 19 75 57 25 35 91 56 9 22 87 65 13
Male 26 82 55 18 23 80 57 20 23 79 56 21
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black - 45 45 55 14 71 57 29 20 67 47 33
Hispanic 30 90 60 10 27 82 55 18 17 83 67 17
White 25 82 56 18 30 88 58 12 23 87 63 13
Two or more races < < < < 36 82 45 18 17 75 58 25
Students with Disabilities 15 46 31 54 - 45 45 55 - 64 64 36
Students without Disabilities 24 83 58 17 32 89 57 11 25 85 61 15
Economically Disadvantaged 14 66 51 34 18 78 59 22 18 73 56 27
Not Economically Disadvantaged 27 84 57 16 35 90 55 10 24 88 64 12
English Learners < 100 < 0 < < < < 18 73 55 27
Grade 5 English Reading Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 41 88 47 13 27 84 57 16 36 85 49 15
Female 47 89 42 11 21 75 54 25 41 89 47 11
Male 31 85 54 15 31 90 59 10 30 81 51 19
Asian < 100 < 0 < < < < < 100 < 0
Black 40 90 50 10 10 50 40 50 31 88 56 13
Hispanic 33 92 58 8 < 100 < 0 23 77 54 23
White 37 87 49 13 27 86 59 14 40 87 47 13
Two or more races 64 82 18 18 < 100 < 0 18 73 55 27
Students with Disabilities 20 40 20 60 18 36 18 64 13 40 27 60
Students without Disabilities 42 92 49 8 28 88 60 12 38 90 51 10
Economically Disadvantaged 36 73 36 27 23 80 58 20 23 79 55 21
Not Economically Disadvantaged 42 93 51 7 29 86 57 14 43 89 46 11
English Learners < < < < < < < < < < < <
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Math

Math Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students assessed in mathematics in grades 3-8 and at the end of the following secondary mathematics courses: Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select a specific mathematics test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

The content of the Standards of Learning for mathematics supports the following five goals for students: becoming mathematical problem solvers, communicating mathematically, reasoning mathematically, making mathematical connections, and using mathematical representations to model and interpret practical situations.

Throughout a student’s mathematics schooling from kindergarten through grade eight, specific content strands or topics are included. These content strands are Number and Number Sense; Computation and Estimation; Measurement; Geometry; Probability and Statistics; and Patterns, Functions, and Algebra. The Standards of Learning for each strand progress in complexity at each grade level and throughout the high school courses.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Math Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 23 83 60 17 26 83 58 17 22 82 59 18
Female 20 84 64 16 23 83 60 17 19 82 64 18
Male 26 82 56 18 28 84 56 16 27 81 54 19
Asian < 100 < 0 < < < < < 100 < 0
Black 14 69 54 31 8 67 58 33 13 70 57 30
Hispanic 20 83 63 17 15 89 74 11 20 80 61 20
White 25 85 60 15 28 85 58 15 24 84 60 16
Two or more races 23 77 53 23 34 79 45 21 21 76 55 24
Students with Disabilities 17 40 23 60 10 36 26 64 9 34 25 66
Students without Disabilities 24 87 63 13 28 89 61 11 24 87 63 13
Economically Disadvantaged 21 73 53 27 20 80 60 20 18 75 56 25
Not Economically Disadvantaged 24 87 63 13 29 85 57 15 25 85 61 15
English Learners 27 73 47 27 25 69 44 31 30 70 40 30
Grade 3 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 27 85 58 15 22 86 64 14 16 72 57 28
Female 22 88 66 12 23 87 64 13 9 74 65 26
Male 32 81 49 19 21 85 65 15 23 71 48 29
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black 14 79 64 21 8 77 69 23 13 63 50 38
Hispanic 23 92 69 8 10 90 80 10 19 69 50 31
White 29 86 57 14 24 87 63 13 13 73 59 27
Two or more races 18 73 55 27 25 83 58 17 30 90 60 10
Students with Disabilities < < < < 11 44 33 56 - 27 27 73
Students without Disabilities 28 87 59 13 24 93 70 7 18 78 61 22
Economically Disadvantaged 23 81 57 19 18 85 68 15 17 67 50 33
Not Economically Disadvantaged 28 87 59 13 24 87 63 13 15 75 60 25
English Learners < < < < < < < < < < < <
Grade 4 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 29 80 51 20 31 86 56 14 22 88 66 12
Female 22 74 52 26 26 88 63 12 16 89 73 11
Male 33 84 51 16 37 84 47 16 29 87 58 13
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black - 45 45 55 15 77 62 23 7 73 67 27
Hispanic 40 70 30 30 9 100 91 0 25 92 67 8
White 30 85 55 15 33 87 54 13 23 91 68 9
Two or more races < < < < 45 73 27 27 17 75 58 25
Students with Disabilities 25 33 8 67 - 30 30 70 21 50 29 50
Students without Disabilities 29 84 55 16 33 90 58 10 22 92 70 8
Economically Disadvantaged 14 66 51 34 20 82 61 18 16 80 64 20
Not Economically Disadvantaged 34 85 51 15 35 89 53 11 25 92 67 8
English Learners < < < < < 100 < 0 27 82 55 18
Grade 5 Mathematics Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 14 80 66 20 18 72 54 28 29 84 56 16
Female 19 82 63 18 14 65 51 35 29 84 55 16
Male 7 77 70 23 21 77 56 23 28 85 57 15
Asian < 100 < 0 < < < < < 100 < 0
Black < < < < - 40 40 60 19 75 56 25
Hispanic - 80 80 20 < < < < 15 85 69 15
White 15 81 67 19 20 78 58 22 33 88 55 13
Two or more races < < < < < < < < 18 64 45 36
Students with Disabilities 20 40 20 60 18 27 9 73 7 27 20 73
Students without Disabilities 13 84 71 16 18 78 60 22 31 90 60 10
Economically Disadvantaged 21 66 45 34 14 69 56 31 21 77 55 23
Not Economically Disadvantaged 11 86 75 14 20 74 54 26 32 89 56 11
English Learners < < < < < < < < < < < <
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Science

Science Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students are assessed in science in grades 5 and 8 and at the end of the following secondary courses: Earth Science, Biology, and Chemistry. Before 2014, students also were assessed in science in grade 4. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select results for a specific science test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s Science Standards of Learning identify academic content for essential components of the science curriculum at different grade levels. Standards are identified for kindergarten through grade five, for middle school, and for a core set of high school courses — Earth Science, Biology, Chemistry, and Physics. Throughout a student’s science schooling from kindergarten through grade six, content strands, or topics are included. The Standards of Learning in each strand progress in complexity as they are studied at various grade levels in grades K-6, and are represented indirectly throughout the high school courses.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: Science Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 48 89 41 11 41 93 52 7 31 84 53 16
Female 51 88 38 12 34 90 56 10 29 83 54 17
Male 44 90 46 10 45 95 50 5 34 86 53 14
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black 64 91 27 9 10 70 60 30 19 81 63 19
Hispanic 25 92 67 8 < 100 < 0 15 85 69 15
White 45 89 44 11 43 94 51 6 35 87 52 13
Two or more races 73 82 9 18 < 100 < 0 27 64 36 36
Students with Disabilities 20 40 20 60 18 36 18 64 13 27 13 73
Students without Disabilities 50 93 43 7 43 98 55 2 33 90 58 10
Economically Disadvantaged 36 73 36 27 34 85 51 15 20 71 52 29
Not Economically Disadvantaged 52 95 43 5 44 97 53 3 37 91 54 9
English Learners < < < < < 100 < 0 < < < <
Grade 5 Science Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 48 89 41 11 41 93 52 7 31 84 53 16
Female 51 88 38 12 34 90 56 10 29 83 54 17
Male 44 90 46 10 45 95 50 5 34 86 53 14
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black 64 91 27 9 10 70 60 30 19 81 63 19
Hispanic 25 92 67 8 < 100 < 0 15 85 69 15
White 45 89 44 11 43 94 51 6 35 87 52 13
Two or more races 73 82 9 18 < 100 < 0 27 64 36 36
Students with Disabilities 20 40 20 60 18 36 18 64 13 27 13 73
Students without Disabilities 50 93 43 7 43 98 55 2 33 90 58 10
Economically Disadvantaged 36 73 36 27 34 85 51 15 20 71 52 29
Not Economically Disadvantaged 52 95 43 5 44 97 53 3 37 91 54 9
English Learners < < < < < 100 < 0 < < < <
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

History

History Performance: All Students

Note: Calculations for 2017-2018 annual pass rates on Standards of Learning tests in reading, writing, mathematics, science and history were modified to reflect new federal reporting requirements.

Virginia public school students are assessed in history and social science following instruction in Virginia Studies in elementary school, Civics and Economics in middle school, and at the conclusion of the following secondary courses: World History and Geography to 1500, World History and Geography 1500 to the Present, World Geography, and Virginia and U.S. History. Use the drop down menu above the chart to select a specific history or social science test. Use the menu below the chart to select assessment results for a specific group of students.

Virginia’s History and Social Science Standards of Learning are designed to

  • develop the knowledge and skills of history, geography, civics, and economics that enable students to place the people, ideas, and events that have shaped our state and our nation in perspective;
  • instill in students a thoughtful pride in the history of America through an understanding that what “We the People of the United States” launched more than two centuries ago was not a perfect union, but a continual effort to build a “more perfect” union, one which has become the world’s most successful example of constitutional self-government;
  • enable students to understand the basic values, principles, and operation of American constitutional democracy;
  • prepare students for informed, responsible, and participatory citizenship;
  • develop students’ skills in debate, discussion, and writing; and
  • provide students with a framework for continuing education in history and the social sciences.

Recently retired SOL tests representative of the content and skills included in current SOL tests are available on the Virginia Department of Education website to assist in understanding the format of the tests and questions.

Overall Student Performance: History Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 48 90 42 10 54 90 36 10 34 92 58 8
Female 33 81 48 19 50 94 44 6 31 91 60 9
Male 58 95 38 5 59 84 26 16 38 93 56 7
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black 18 73 55 27 29 79 50 21 20 87 67 13
Hispanic 50 90 40 10 55 100 45 0 30 100 70 0
White 50 91 41 9 57 91 33 9 34 92 58 8
Two or more races < 100 < 0 45 82 36 18 50 92 42 8
Students with Disabilities 17 58 42 42 9 55 45 45 14 71 57 29
Students without Disabilities 51 93 42 7 57 92 35 8 37 95 58 5
Economically Disadvantaged 20 80 60 20 37 88 51 12 24 90 66 10
Not Economically Disadvantaged 58 93 36 7 62 91 29 9 39 93 54 7
English Learners < < < < < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
VA Studies Performance 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Student Subgroup Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed Advanced Passed Proficient Failed
All Students 48 90 42 10 54 90 36 10 35 92 57 8
Female 33 81 48 19 50 94 44 6 32 91 59 9
Male 57 95 38 5 59 84 26 16 38 93 56 7
Asian < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
Black 18 73 55 27 29 79 50 21 20 87 67 13
Hispanic < < < < 55 100 45 0 < 100 < 0
White 50 91 41 9 57 91 33 9 34 92 58 8
Two or more races < 100 < 0 45 82 36 18 50 92 42 8
Students with Disabilities < < < < 9 55 45 45 15 69 54 31
Students without Disabilities 51 93 42 7 57 92 35 8 37 95 58 5
Economically Disadvantaged 18 79 61 21 37 88 51 12 24 90 66 10
Not Economically Disadvantaged 57 93 36 7 62 91 29 9 40 93 53 7
English Learners < < < < < 100 < 0 < 100 < 0
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Number of recently arrived English language learners exempted from state reading assessments

2015-20162016-20172017-2018
State3,4624,2272,762
Division410
School200
Number of recently arrived English language learners exempted from state reading assessments

Enrollment

Fall Membership by Grade

Grade 2016-20172017-20182018-2019
Grade 3122144130
Grade 4161126135
Grade 5136159134
Total Students419429399
Fall Membership by Grade
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

Fall Membership by Subgroups

2018 Fall Membership By Subgroup: Racial and Ethnic Groups

The Virginia Department of Education annually collects statistics on the number of students enrolled in public schools on September 30.  Student counts are reported by grade assignment, race, ethnicity, disability, English proficiency, and economic status.

The collection of race and ethnicity information as specified by the U.S. Department of Education is required for eligibility for federal education funds and for accountability reports.

A student is reported as economically disadvantaged if he or she meets any one of the following criteria:

  • Is eligible for Free/Reduced Meals;
  • Receives Temporary Assistance for Needy Families;
  • Is eligible for Medicaid; or
  • Is a migrant or is experiencing homelessness.

.

Fall Membership by Subgroup
Subgroup 2016-20172017-20182018-2019
All Students419429399
Female213226206
Male206203193
Asian634
Black374849
Hispanic283648
White317306266
Two or more races313532
Students with Disabilities374541
Students without Disabilities382384358
Economically Disadvantaged117133140
Not Economically Disadvantaged302296259
English Learners201824
Not English Learners399411375
Homeless1596
Foster Care321
Military Connected101414
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

School Finance

Percentage of Expenditures

Division Expenditures

Multiple factors should be considered when comparing the level of school division expenditures for instruction and expenditures for non-instructional costs, such as administration, health services and pupil transportation. These factors include economies of scale, geographic size, and the number of students requiring special services. For example:

  • Smaller school divisions may have similar administrative and support costs as larger divisions but these non-instructional costs are spread over a smaller expenditure base.
  • Geographically large but sparsely populated school divisions may have higher per-pupil transportation costs because of travel distances and mountainous topography.
  • Divisions with large populations of at-risk or special needs students must provide support services that are required or that raise student achievement.
School Division - Percentage of Expenditures
  2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Percentage of fiscal year division
operating expenditures for instructional costs
63.6 63.7 63.4

Statewide Expenditures

The state Board of Education prescribes the following major classifications for expenditures of school funds: instruction; administration, attendance and health; pupil transportation; operation and maintenance; school food services and other non-instructional operations; facilities, debt and fund transfers; technology; and contingency reserves.

Instructional costs include the salaries and benefits paid to teachers, teacher aides, principals, assistant principals, librarians, and guidance counselors; expenditures for textbooks; and expenditures for students to participate in regional and virtual instructional programs.

School State - Percentage of Expenditures
  2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Percentage of fiscal year state
operating expenditures for instructional costs
67.1 66.9 67.2

Sources of Financial Support and Total Per Pupil Expenditures for Operations

Division Per-Pupil Spending

School divisions report annually on expenditures and appropriations to meet each locality’s required local effort in support of the Standards of Quality and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. The amount by which school divisions exceed these required minimums varies based on local decisions and circumstances.

School Quality Profiles for the 2018-2019 school year will include additional information about per-pupil expenditures for the commonwealth, school divisions and schools. VDOE is working with school divisions to gather this information as required under the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015.

Most state support for public education is equalized to reflect each division’s capacity to support the required educational program. The Composite Index of Local Ability-to-Pay determines state and local shares of Standards of Quality costs for each division and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. A portion of state sales tax revenues is distributed in support of public education based on school-age population estimates.

The federal government provides assistance to state and local education agencies in support of specific federal initiatives and mandates, such as instructional services for economically disadvantaged students and students with disabilities.

School Division - Per-Pupil Spending
  Local Funding State Federal
2014-20153,732.005,068.00987.00
2015-20164,109.005,146.001,015.00
2016-20174,098.005,342.001,074.00

Statewide Per-Pupil Spending

The apportionment of the state funds for public education is the responsibility of the General Assembly, through the Appropriations Act. General fund appropriations serve as the mainstay of state support for the commonwealth’s public schools, augmented by retail sales and use tax revenues, state lottery proceeds, and other sources.

Counties, cities and towns comprising school divisions also support public education by providing the locality’s share to maintain an educational program meeting the commonwealth’s Standards of Quality and local match requirements for incentive and lottery-funded programs. .

While public education is primarily a state and local responsibility, the federal government provides assistance to state and local education agencies in support of specific federal initiatives and mandates.

School Quality Profiles for the 2018-2019 school year will include additional information about per-pupil expenditures for the commonwealth, school divisions and schools. VDOE is working with school divisions to gather this information as required under the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015.

State - Per-Pupil Spending
  Local Funding State Federal
2014-20155,950.004,802.00771.00
2015-20166,101.004,831.00812.00
2016-20176,268.005,033.00871.00

Learning Climate

Chronic Absenteeism

Chronic Absenteeism 2017-2018 School Year:

Daily attendance is critical to success in school. A student is considered chronically absent if he or she is absent for 10 percent or more of the school year, regardless of whether the absences are excused or unexcused. According to the U.S. Department of Education:

  • Children who are chronically absent in preschool, kindergarten, and first grade are much less likely to read on grade level by the third grade.
  • Students who can’t read at grade level by the third grade are four times more likely to drop out of high school.
  • By high school, regular attendance is a better dropout indicator than test scores.
  • A student who is chronically absent in any year between the eighth and twelfth grade is seven times more likely to drop out of school.

The calculation for chronic absenteeism only includes students enrolled for at least half of the school year.

Absenteeism by Subgroup
2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Subgroup Below 10% 10% or Above Below 10% 10% or Above Below 10% 10% or Above
All Students396423753939831
Female197281832020817
Male199141921919014
Asian<<<<<<
Black351361443
Hispanic322272393
White292352793527923
Two or more races284271322
Students with Disabilities307349358
Economically Disadvantaged121211261713515
English Learners132221201
Homeless131133170
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Standards of Accreditation (SOA) Offenses Data

2017-2018 Offenses
  Number of Offenses
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Short Term Suspensions

Short Term Suspensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

A short-term suspension (10 days of less) may be imposed by a principal, an assistant principal, or a designee teacher in the principal’s absence. The principal or assistant principal must tell the student of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his version of what occurred. Notice to the parent may be oral or written, depending on local school board policy, and must include information on the length of the suspension, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired.  A parent may ask for a short-term suspension decision to be reviewed by the superintendent or his designee. Local school board policy will determine whether the superintendent’s decision is final or can be appealed to the local school board. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Short Term Suspensions
  2016-20172017-2018
Subgroup % Population% Short Term Suspensions% Population% Short Term Suspensions
American Indian
Asian1.4320.699
Black8.83111.189
Hispanic6.6838.392
Native Hawaiian0.233
White75.6565071.329
Two or more races7.399508.159
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Long Term Suspensions

Long Term Supensions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

A long-term suspension (more than 10 school days and less than 365 calendar days)  is usually imposed by a disciplinary hearing officer upon recommendation of a principal. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred. Notice to the parent (and child) must be in writing and must include information on the length of and reason for the suspension, the right to a hearing in accordance with local school board policy, the availability of community-based educational options, and the student’s right to return to regular school attendance when the suspension period has expired or to attend an appropriate alternative education program approved by the school board during the suspension or after the suspension period expires. Costs for any community-based educational programs or alternative programs that are not part of the program offered by the school division are the financial responsibility of the parent. A parent has the right to appeal a long-term suspension decision in accordance with local school board policy. The appeal may first go to the local superintendent or his or her designee or to a sub-committee of the local school board; final appeal is to the full school board. The appeal must be decided by the school board within 30 days. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Long Term Suspensions
  2016-20172017-2018
Subgroup % Population% Long Term Suspensions% Population% Long Term Suspensions
American Indian
Asian1.4320.699
Black8.83111.189
Hispanic6.6838.392
Native Hawaiian0.233
White75.65671.329
Two or more races7.3998.159
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Expulsions

Expulsions:

Increasingly, Virginia schools are implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, a nationally-recognized approach to support positive academic and behavioral outcomes for students. This positive approach to discipline prepares teachers and principals to implement new techniques that reduce disruptive student behaviors that lead to suspensions and decrease instructional time.

An expulsion (removal from school for 365 calendar days) may only be imposed by a local school board. The student must be told of the charges against him or her. If the student denies them, he or she is given an explanation of the facts as known to the school and an opportunity to present his or her version of what occurred.  The parent (and child) must be noticed in writing of the proposed expulsion, the reasons the expulsion is being proposed, and of the right to a hearing before the school board or a sub-committee of the school board, depending on local policy. If the student is expelled, the parent is sent a written notification of the length of the expulsion and information on the availability of community-based educational, training, and intervention programs. The notice must state whether the student is eligible to return to regular school or to attend an approved alternative education program or an adult education program offered during or after the period of expulsion. The student may apply for readmission to be effective one calendar year from the date of his or her expulsion. For more information, see A Parent’s Guide To Understanding Student Discipline Policies and Practices In Virginia Schools.

Expulsions
  2016-20172017-2018
Subgroup % Population% Expulsions% Population% Expulsions
American Indian
Asian1.4320.699
Black8.83111.189
Hispanic6.6838.392
Native Hawaiian0.233
White75.65671.329
Two or more races7.3998.159
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility:

School divisions that choose to take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated commodities from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal they serve. In return, they must serve lunches that meet Federal requirements, and they must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children. The School Breakfast Program operates by supporting breakfasts in the same manner as the National School Lunch Program.

 

At the beginning of each school year, letters and meal applications are distributed to households of children attending school. This letter informs households that school nutrition programs are available and that free and reduced-price meals are available based on income criteria. Applications have been eliminated totally in divisions that implement the community eligibility provision for all schools within the division.

Children from families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the poverty level are eligible for free meals. Those between 130 percent and 185 percent of the poverty level are eligible for reduced-price meals, for which students can be charged no more than 40 cents for lunch and 30 cents for breakfast. All other students pay the full price for meals.

See the Virginia Department of Education website for more information about school nutrition programs.

Free and Reduced Meal Eligibility
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 32.443840.44
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation of Eligible Students :

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Breakfast Program. The School Breakfast Program is a federally assisted meal program that provides nutritious breakfast meals to students. The Virginia Department of Education administers the program at the state level and school divisions administer the program at the local level.

Participation in the School Breakfast Program has been linked increased achievement, reduced absenteeism and tardiness, fewer disciplinary problems, and better student health.

Breakfast menus must provide one-fourth of the daily recommended levels for protein, calcium, iron, Vitamin A, Vitamin C and calories. Participating schools must serve breakfasts that meet Federal nutrition standards – one quarter of daily recommended levels of protein, calcium, iron, vitamins A and C and calories – and must provide free and reduced-price breakfasts to eligible children.

The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.

 

Free and Reduced Breakfast Participation
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 52.0738.3838.81
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation of Eligible Students:

The above pie graph displays the average daily percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals who participated in the U.S. Department of Agriculture School Lunch Program.

School divisions that take part in the National School Lunch Program get cash subsidies and donated food items from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for each meal served. In return, schools must serve lunches that meet federal requirements, and must offer free or reduced-price lunches to eligible children.

Studies show that well-nourished students are better learners. The No Kid Hungry Virginia campaign and the Virginia 365 Project are key state initiatives to increase participation in school nutrition programs and eliminate childhood hunger.

 

Free and Reduced Lunch Participation
  2014-20152015-20162016-2017
  PercentagePercentagePercentage
All Students 81.6670.7169.15
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
Unduplicated = Students are able to be in two gap groups

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality
Teachers Not Properly Licensed or Endorsed​ Provisionally Licensed Teachers​ Inexperienced Teachers​
Title I Not Title I Title I Not Title I Title I Not Title I
School
This School - - - - - 2.9%
Division
All Schools 14.7% 4.5% 6.4% 5.2% 12.2% 5.2%
High Poverty 30.6% - 6.9% - 5.6% -
Low Poverty - - - - - -
State
All Schools 1.6% 2.6% 7.1% 7% 6.4% 4.5%
High Poverty 2% 5.1% 8% 11.5% 7.4% 7.6%
Low Poverty 1.1% 1.6% 2.8% 5.7% 4.2% 3.6%
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available
This table reports the percentages of teachers at the school, division and state levels who are not properly licensed or endorsed for the content they are teaching, who are provisionally licensed, or who are inexperienced (less than one year of classroom experience). Percentages are reported for Title I schools, non-Title I schools, all schools and for high-poverty and low-poverty schools.

Provisionally Licensed Teachers

Provisionally Licensed Teachers
  2016-20172017-2018
Provisional Special Education0%0%
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

This table reports the percentage of teachers teaching with provisional or provisional special education credentials.

This table provides data on the percentage of classes not taught by teachers meeting the federal definition of highly qualified.

Federal education law defines a highly qualified teacher as a teacher who is fully licensed by the state, has at least a bachelor’s degree, has demonstrated competency in each subject taught, and is teaching in his or her area of endorsement.

Virginia’s licensure regulations – which emphasize content knowledge as well as pedagogy – require new teachers to far exceed the federal highly qualified standard.

Teacher Educational Attainment

Teacher Educational Attainment: 2017-2018

The Virginia Department of Education reports annually on the percentage of teachers with bachelor’s, master’s, or doctorate degrees in schools, school divisions, and the state by highest degree earned.

Teacher Educational Attainment
  Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Doctoral Degree Other
2015-201650%47%0%3%
2016-201749%49%0%2%
2017-201849%46%0%5%
LEGEND < = A group below state definition for personally identifiable results
- = No data for group
* = Data not yet available

Every Student Succeeds Act

ESSA Status: Not Identified for Support and Improvement
Accreditation Status: Accredited

ESSA School Quality Indicators Summary
Student GroupEnglish Reading PerformanceMathematics PerformanceEnglish Learner ProgressChronic AbsenteeismFederal Graduation Indicator
All StudentsYesYes-Yes-
AsianTSTS-TS-
BlackYesYes-Yes-
HispanicYesYes-Yes-
WhiteYesYes-Yes-
Economically DisadvantagedYesYes-Yes-
English LearnersYesYesTSYes-
Students with DisabilitiesYesNo-No-

Yes = Annual target met
No = Annual target not met
TS = Too few students to evaluate
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 (ESSA) requires states to set annual and long-term targets for raising the achievement of all students. Virginia schools are focused on the following school quality indicators in meeting the objectives of the federal law:
  • Reading performance — percentage of students in the school passing state tests in reading
  • Mathematics performance — percentage of students in the school passing state tests in mathematics
  • Growth in reading and mathematics — percentage of students in the school either passing state tests in reading and mathematics or making significant progress toward passing
  • English learner progress — percentage of English learners making progress toward English-language proficiency
  • Chronic absenteeism — percentage of students missing 10 percent or more of the school year, regardless of reason (students receiving homebound and home-based instruction excluded)
  • Federal Graduation Indicator — percentage of students graduating within four years of entering the ninth grade with a Standard Diploma or Advanced Studies Diploma
More information about ESSA implementation in Virginia is available on the Virginia Department of Education website. Detailed state assessment results — including results by test type and student groups — are available on VDOE’s Test Results Build-A-Table data tool.
ESSA Annual Targets and Long-Term Goals: Reading
Student GroupCurrent RateThree-Year RateAnnual TargetLong Term Goal
All Students80%82%73%75%
Asian<94%87%75%
Black72%69%60%75%
Hispanic75%83%63%75%
White82%84%81%75%
Economically Disadvantaged71%73%62%75%
English Learners63%71%53%75%
Students with Disabilities45%49%39%75%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires annual testing in reading in grades 3-8 and once during high school. Virginia’s ESSA implementation plan expects that by the 2023-2024 school year, at least 75 percent of all students, and of all students in the student groups listed in this table, will be able to demonstrate grade-level proficiency by passing state reading tests. Annual targets for student groups reflect improvement upon base-line performance from the 2015-2016 school year. Student groups meeting or exceeding annual or long-term targets must improve performance as compared to the previous year. Note: Reading pass rates reported for high schools reflect the performance of a 12th-grade class of students who entered the ninth grade at the same time.
ESSA Annual Targets and Long-Term Goals: Mathematics
Student GroupCurrent RateThree-Year RateAnnual TargetLong Term Goal
All Students82%83%74%70%
Asian<89%89%70%
Black70%68%60%70%
Hispanic83%84%64%70%
White84%85%81%70%
Economically Disadvantaged75%75%63%70%
English Learners74%67%57%70%
Students with Disabilities34%38%42%70%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires annual testing in mathematics in grades 3-8 and once during high school. Virginia’s ESSA implementation plan expects that by the 2023-2024 school year, at least 70 percent of all students, and of all students in the student groups listed in this table, will be able to demonstrate grade-level proficiency by passing state mathematics tests. Annual targets for student groups reflect improvement upon base-line performance during the 2015-2016 school year. Student groups meeting or exceeding annual or long-term targets must improve performance compared to the previous year. Note: Mathematics pass rates reported for high schools reflect the performance of a 12th-grade class of students who entered the ninth grade at the same time on one of the following state tests: Algebra I, Geometry or Algebra II.
ESSA Pass Rates: Science
Student GroupCurrent Rate
All Students84%
Asian<
Black81%
Hispanic85%
White87%
Economically Disadvantaged71%
English Learners<
Students with Disabilities27%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires that students take state tests in science at least once during elementary school, once during middle school and once during high school. Note: Science pass rates reported for high schools reflect the performance on the state Biology test of a 12th-grade class of students who entered the ninth grade at the same time.
Growth in Reading and Mathematics
Student GroupGrowth English ReadingGrowth Mathematics
All Students82%82%
Asian<<
Black77%72%
Hispanic78%83%
White84%84%
Economically Disadvantaged76%76%
English Learners68%74%
Students with Disabilities55%36%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

Under the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, growth in reading and mathematics is a factor in identifying elementary and middle schools for improvement and increased state support. The percentage of students showing growth in reading and mathematics includes students passing state tests and non-passing students who are making significant progress toward passing.
Chronic Absenteeism
Student GroupCurrent RateThree-Year RateAnnual TargetLong Term Goal
All Students7%9%9%10%
Asian<-5%10%
Black6%4%9%10%
Hispanic7%7%9%10%
White8%10%9%10%
Economically Disadvantaged10%12%13%10%
English Learners5%7%8%10%
Students with Disabilities19%20%14%10%

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

Daily attendance is critical to success in school. A student is considered chronically absent if he or she is absent for 10 percent or more of the school year, regardless of whether the absences are excused or unexcused. According to the U.S. Department of Education:
  • Children who are chronically absent in preschool, kindergarten, and first grade are much less likely to read on grade level by the third grade.
  • Students who can't read at grade level by the third grade are four times more likely to drop out of high school.
  • By high school, regular attendance is a better dropout indicator than test scores.
  • A student who is chronically absent in any year between the eighth and twelfth grade is seven times more likely to drop out of school.
The calculation for chronic absenteeism only includes students enrolled for at least half of the school year. The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires states to set annual and long-term targets for reducing chronic absenteeism. Virginia’s ESSA implementation plan expects that by the 2023-2024 school year, no more than 10 percent of all students, and of students in the student groups listed in this table, will be chronically absent. Annual targets for student groups reflect improvement upon base-line data from the 2015-2016 school year. Student groups meeting or exceeding annual or long-term targets for reducing chronic absenteeism must improve performance compared to the previous year.
English Learner Progress and Proficiency
English LearnersPercentAnnual TargetLong Term Goal
English Learner Progress75%46%58%
English Learner Proficiency40%--
< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students
The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires states to set annual targets and long-term goals for increasing the percentage of English learners making progress toward attaining English-language proficiency. Virginia also reports on the percentage of English learners who attain proficiency.
English LearnersNumeratorDenominatorRate
English Learner Progress91275%
English Learner Proficiency61540%
ESSA Participation Rates
Student GroupEnglish Reading ParticipationMathematics ParticipationScience Participation
All Students100%100%100%
Asian<<<
Black100%100%100%
Hispanic100%100%100%
White100%100%100%
Economically Disadvantaged100%100%100%
Not Economically Disadvantaged100%100%100%
English Learners100%100%<
Students with Disabilities100%100%100%
Students without Disabilities100%100%100%
Female100%100%100%
Male100%100%100%
Migrant---

< = Results suppressed to protect student privacy
— = Not applicable or no students

The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires states to assess at least 95 percent of students in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8, and to test at least 95 percent of students in reading and mathematics at least once during their high school careers. States also report on the percentage of students assessed in science in elementary school, middle school and in high school (Biology).
Locust Grove Elementary to top